ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » RFH2 performance

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 RFH2 performance « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
funknor
PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 12:57 pm    Post subject: RFH2 performance Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 6

We are planning to move our header data from the usr folder in RFH2 to the message body. What is the expected performance degregation when

a) using XML elements
b) MRM elements (for copybook)

Does anyone have a performance comparison how processing performs using the usr folder elements in RFH2 compared to a custom/propriatary message format?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kirani
PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 05 Sep 2001
Posts: 3779
Location: Torrance, CA, USA

If your move your header data into message body area then you will need to parse the message to retrieve "header data", which will perform slower as compared to your existing design. Are you sure you want to do this?

Generic XML will perform better than MRM (CWF, TDS or XML). Please take a look at performance report for WMQI/WBIMB for your platform for exact numbers.
_________________
Kiran


IBM Cert. Solution Designer & System Administrator - WBIMB V5
IBM Cert. Solutions Expert - WMQI
IBM Cert. Specialist - WMQI, MQSeries
IBM Cert. Developer - MQSeries

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
funknor
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 12:30 pm    Post subject: Performance data needed to proof the performance degragation Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 6

Thank you for your response, thats what I assumed too. The "lead architect" in our project decided to go this direction despite my performance degragation warnings. The design indeeds is based on the usage of MRM that further slows down the processing.

But what I need is some tangible data proving the point. If there has been any mearurements done describing the performance impact (i.e. overhead of xx milliseconds, percentage of total processing, limitations of message throughput for a specific platform) thats what I am looking for.

Also any anekdotes an opinions as you said are very helpful
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » RFH2 performance
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.