| Author |
Message
|
| karthik |
 Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:07 pm Post subject: Configuration error |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 17 Oct 2003
Posts: 114
|
Hi
We have WF 3.4 cofigured with 2 systems in the System group on an AIX box.
The database is on a remote database box (on AIX too).
We decided that we need a new System Group rather than 2 systems in the Same group. We got permissions from DB2 group for DataBase table spaces and all the permissions required to create a new configuration.
I deleted the old configuration and started a new one
While i am configuring i am getting this error.
FMC33999E Internal error: 'FmcAssertionException, Condition=*** Assertion failed
in /projects/fmc/drvp/lbld/v340/aix/src/fmczcfnc.cxx(1502): setregid(procGroupI
D, procGroupID) == 0'.
- FMC33920E Error occurred. See /var/fmc/cfgs/FMC1/log/@fmczrt.log.root for mor
e information.
I tried to see the error in @fmczrt.log.root , but that file was non existent..
Can anyone help me with this..
Thanks in advance
Karthik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jmac |
| Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Unless something has changed, what you are attempting is not possible. There can only be 1 SystemGroup per Domain.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| karthik |
| Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 17 Oct 2003
Posts: 114
|
Does that mean a company cannot have more than one System group.
I tried the same thing on my desktop , deleting a system from the system group and later creating a new System group pointing to a new database in the same instance.
It worked . I am not quite sure what i am missing here .
Please give me more details on these concepts so that i have a better
understanding.
Thanks
karthik |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ratan |
| Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
A company can have as many system groups as it likes as long as each group points to a new Runtime Database.
There is only on System Group per Domain in the current WF implementation. You can have as many domains as you like each pointing to different runtime DB.
_________________
-Ratan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Paul D |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 200
Location: Green Bay Packer Country
|
I'm assisting karthik in this issue at our company. Hopefully this explaination will help. We have one physical AIX box to run the WF servers on. We have a different dedicated AIX UDB box to host the one or more runtime databases we want to use. What we are trying to do is create seperate WF servers to run different versions of the FDL objects on. We want to create seperate development, test, stage environments. We need to be able to run different versions of the same template in each environment so we can create releases of our workflow application, to go along with releases of all the applications that it integrates with. Can we do this given the hardware resources we have available to us? If so, how do we do this?
Thanks in advance for all your help...
Paul and Karthik
_________________
Thanks!!!
Paul D |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Unless I am missing something, the answer is to define multiple DOMAINS, each one with its unique SystemGroup, and thus unigue database.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ratan |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
You should be able to do this. Have a seperate WF configuration for each of the environments.
_________________
-Ratan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| karthik |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 17 Oct 2003
Posts: 114
|
Thanks ratan
What we tried to do was also a new configuration for each of the environments with each configuration pointing to its own runtime database. All the configurations will be on the same AIX box.
Is this the setup you were suggesting?
Please suggest the best way to do this ..
thanks
karthik |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ratan |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
Yes, that is the way with the resources you have at your disposal.
_________________
-Ratan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| karthik |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 17 Oct 2003
Posts: 114
|
thanks ratan
that clears most of our doubts
John
I have a doubt when you specified about multiple domains.
How does one specify about a domain in his configuration.
Because during the configuration one is never prompted to enter a Domain name , so how does one specify the domain name etc;
Do we need a seperate file systems for each domain ?
Thanks in advance
karthik |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vennela |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
| Quote: |
| I have a doubt when you specified about multiple domains. |
Right now there is no concept of multiple domains in workflow.
| Quote: |
How does one specify about a domain in his configuration.
|
You cannot specify anything for DOMAIN. A domain is going to remain as domain in your workflow. You got to live with that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
The way I see it the Domain and the System Group are basically the same. The original intent was to have multiple System Groups and to allow all of the creation of instances in any System Group that existed within the domain. It just never got there (FlowMark did this by the way).
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
