ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » News/Updates » New: MQ Technical Conference v2.0.1.4

Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2
 New: MQ Technical Conference v2.0.1.4 « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
RogerLacroix
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 3264
Location: London, ON Canada

All,

Thanks for the compliments and yes, my family helps me at Kalahari, so that things go well (I have 5 kids but 2 couldn't come because they are in University).

I can't have all of the sessions be 'advanced' or else none of the newbies will come (and they will just post questions here).

My goal is to have:
- 25% of the sessions for beginners
- 40% of the sessions for intermediate users
- 35% of the sessions for advanced users

Or something like that. That way there is something for everyone.

Now to the flip side, a couple of sponsors have suggested that I add sessions for managers/directors (i.e. because they want to network).

So it is a balancing act (or a headache) as everyone has their own opinion on what sessions I should or should not include.

Actually, most of the session topics are suggested by the speakers. They email me the information, I generally say, 'that sounds great' and that is what we go with. I do take suggestions from people. i.e. The poll for Paul Clarke's sessions and someone here suggested the "Open Discussion About Anything MQ" session which I added this year. So, suggest stuff and I will put it on my list.

If IBM Hursley continues to send 4 speakers and I can get Kalahari to give me Suite #6 for food for next year, then I can free up the Nile & Orange rooms (used for breakfast & lunch). With 2 more rooms, I can go back to 75 minute sessions (vs 60 minutes this year) and maybe add some 'management' sessions.

7 rooms (5 woods plus Nile & Orange) would mean 7 concurrent sessions which would be really cool. Of course, attendees would then be saying "which session should I attend'. Of course, I will do my best to continue to try and have each session presented twice.

Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc.
_________________
Capitalware: Transforming tomorrow into today.
Connected to MQ!
Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PaulClarke
PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 1002
Location: New Zealand

Oh dear....how embarrassing. It has been pointed out to me that at the MQTC Conference the USB Key that was handed out by MQGem Software contained a very old version of the MO71 manual, rather than the one that goes with version 8.0.0. My apologies to all for this mistake, I'm not quite sure how it happened. Put it down to jet-lag!

Anyway, please download a new version of the manual from here http://www.mqgem.com/mo71_download.html. While you are there may I suggest you also download the latest version of the MO71 itself as I have made a small fix since the conference. Since MO71 is essentially a single EXE it is very easy to install fixes !

My apologies for any inconvenience caused,

Cheers,
Paul.
_________________
Paul Clarke
MQGem Software
www.mqgem.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
hughson
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Padawan

Joined: 09 May 2013
Posts: 1959
Location: Bay of Plenty, New Zealand

RogerLacroix wrote:
With 2 more rooms, I can go back to 75 minute sessions (vs 60 minutes this year) and maybe add some 'management' sessions.
More sessions are always good, however, my personal opinion would be to stick with 60 minute sessions. Most of the material we have in IBM is geared towards 60 minute sessions, so that means we are able to offer you more because we have less prep to do!!

You could perhaps have made the afternoon break (the one with cheescake/ice cream etc) slightly longer if you have minutes to spare on the timetable.

Just my 2 cents.

Thanks again for a great conference.

Cheers
Morag
_________________
Morag Hughson @MoragHughson
IBM MQ Technical Education Specialist
Get your IBM MQ training here!
MQGem Software
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bob_buxton
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 23 Aug 2001
Posts: 266
Location: England

Quote:
You could perhaps have made the afternoon break (the one with cheescake/ice cream etc) slightly longer


Roger is just protecting your waistline!
_________________
Bob Buxton
Ex-Websphere MQ Development
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RogerLacroix
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 3264
Location: London, ON Canada

hughson wrote:
Most of the material we have in IBM is geared towards 60 minute sessions, so that means we are able to offer you more because we have less prep to do!!

Oh no, please don't add more content. My idea last year for the 75 minute sessions was to have 50-55 minutes of presentations and the rest used for Q&A. So, if IBM has their sessions timed out to be 60 minutes then that is fine. I like asking questions at sessions and I think so do a lot of other people. Therefore, don't change anything.

hughson wrote:
You could perhaps have made the afternoon break (the one with cheescake/ice cream etc) slightly longer if you have minutes to spare on the timetable.

Yup. I didn't like the afternoon breaks this year either, so for the dessert break next year I'm thinking of making it 30 minutes. There's nothing wrong with having seconds at the cheesecake bar.

Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc.
_________________
Capitalware: Transforming tomorrow into today.
Connected to MQ!
Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gbaddeley
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Posts: 2538
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Random thoughts. Does Capitalware need to be in the name? (What happens if some one else takes over) Does it need to be MQTC? (How about some other groovy unique name & leave MQ in there somewhere)
_________________
Glenn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RogerLacroix
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 3264
Location: London, ON Canada

gbaddeley wrote:
Does Capitalware need to be in the name? (What happens if some one else takes over)

With the amount of work I put into it, I think I can get my name into the title!

gbaddeley wrote:
Does it need to be MQTC?

MQTC == MQ Technical Conference, so yeah, MQTC is a good acronym.

gbaddeley wrote:
How about some other groovy unique name & leave MQ in there somewhere

Humm, like, "MQ didn't lose my message conference".

Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc.
_________________
Capitalware: Transforming tomorrow into today.
Connected to MQ!
Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
tczielke
PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guardian

Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 941
Location: Illinois, USA

RogerLacroix wrote:

gbaddeley wrote:
How about some other groovy unique name & leave MQ in there somewhere

Humm, like, "MQ didn't lose my message conference".


Another option - "MQ Conference - For the Persistent and Non-Persistent"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
smdavies99
PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Council

Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.

'MQ Conference - Assured delivery of the Message'

_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995

Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hughson
PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Padawan

Joined: 09 May 2013
Posts: 1959
Location: Bay of Plenty, New Zealand

gbaddeley wrote:
Does it need to be MQTC?
I think the MQTC acronym has gained some traction, so is worth sticking with.
_________________
Morag Hughson @MoragHughson
IBM MQ Technical Education Specialist
Get your IBM MQ training here!
MQGem Software
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2 Page 2 of 2

MQSeries.net Forum Index » News/Updates » New: MQ Technical Conference v2.0.1.4
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.