ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Deploying message flows in stopped state?

Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Deploying message flows in stopped state? « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
lancelotlinc
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:29 am    Post subject: Re: Deploying message flows in stopped state? Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 4941
Location: Bloomington, IL USA

mkza.swe wrote:
lancelotlinc wrote:
Why don't you create your own post rather than hijack a two year old thread. Or go to class to find out.


Well, I thought it was good forum manner to use the threads that are there instead of creating extra redundant threads.

And thank you, I went to class. I am IBM certified already.

Anyway... Thank you for helpful and constructive post.


Don't put too much stock in your certification. You didn't pay enough attention in class. For newly created EG, the flow will start when deployed. For an EG with existing flow, the runstate will be the same after deployment as before, means if the flow was stopped and you deploy, the flow will remain stopped after deployment.
_________________
http://leanpub.com/IIB_Tips_and_Tricks
Save $20: Coupon Code: MQSERIES_READER
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mqjeff
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmbhelp/v8r0m0/topic/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/bf23600_.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
smdavies99
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Council

Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.

Did you read the various options discussed in this thread?
Did you just dismiss them out of hand? If so why?
If not, what is different about your situation than the one originally raised in this topic?
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995

Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

mqjeff wrote:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmbhelp/v8r0m0/topic/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/bf23600_.htm



_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mqjeff
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

Vitor wrote:
mqjeff wrote:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmbhelp/v8r0m0/topic/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/bf23600_.htm




Until the first time a flow is deployed to production through automated processes and the start state was not updated to be "automatic" and the developer had checked it in as "manual"...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

mqjeff wrote:
Vitor wrote:
mqjeff wrote:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmbhelp/v8r0m0/topic/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/bf23600_.htm




Until the first time a flow is deployed to production through automated processes and the start state was not updated to be "automatic" and the developer had checked it in as "manual"...


You're so "glass half empty"
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lancelotlinc
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 4941
Location: Bloomington, IL USA

mqjeff wrote:
Vitor wrote:
mqjeff wrote:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmbhelp/v8r0m0/topic/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/bf23600_.htm




Until the first time a flow is deployed to production through automated processes and the start state was not updated to be "automatic" and the developer had checked it in as "manual"...


Could be a case of job security. Paid to write the functionality , then paid to fix it.
_________________
http://leanpub.com/IIB_Tips_and_Tricks
Save $20: Coupon Code: MQSERIES_READER
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
zpat
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Council

Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK

Good to see a requirement carried through to release of the feature.

WMB 8.0.0.1 should be along soon - then time to seriously look at using it, or to look at using it seriously...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mqjeff
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

Vitor wrote:
mqjeff wrote:
Vitor wrote:
mqjeff wrote:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmbhelp/v8r0m0/topic/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/bf23600_.htm




Until the first time a flow is deployed to production through automated processes and the start state was not updated to be "automatic" and the developer had checked it in as "manual"...


You're so "glass half empty"


It's not that I'm measuring the fullness of the glass.

I'm looking for the beartraps that will go off when I try to *drink* from it...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

mqjeff wrote:
I'm looking for the beartraps that will go off when I try to *drink* from it...


I've told you about that bar before. Find somewhere else to drink...
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mqjeff
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

Vitor wrote:
mqjeff wrote:
I'm looking for the beartraps that will go off when I try to *drink* from it...


I've told you about that bar before. Find somewhere else to drink...

You don't even *remember* that bar, much less half the cab ride home.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

Dish: Whom did he share the cab with?
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mkza.swe
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 04 Jun 2012
Posts: 16

Thanks Lance and Jeff for helping me find the information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mkza.swe
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 04 Jun 2012
Posts: 16

smdavies99 wrote:
Did you read the various options discussed in this thread?
Did you just dismiss them out of hand? If so why?
If not, what is different about your situation than the one originally raised in this topic?


Yes, I read all the posts.
No, I did't dismiss them as "solutions". I already figured those out before comming here. I was just wondering if there is a "right" way to do it, not just a "work around".

I can even give you some more work arounds that noone mentioned yet, that also would work for non-MQ based flows, when deploying the first time:
- Manipulate your input node, to read from an empty directory, or create an empty queue to read from etc. Deploy the flow, then stop it. Then change back the configuration of the input node to read correctly, and deploy the node again, and the stopped state will be preserved.

This way you wont get any error log overflow by inhibiting queues and you can do it with files etc too. I would still only call it a workaround though, not a great solution. However it seems version 8 fixes it according to mqjeff's post above.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mapa
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 09 Aug 2001
Posts: 257
Location: Malmö, Sweden

Seems to be in WMB 7.0.0.4 as well, doesn't it?

IC78988: IMPLEMENT FLOWSTARTMODE ON WEBSPHERE MESSAGE BROKER VERSION 7
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next Page 2 of 3

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Deploying message flows in stopped state?
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.