| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Integration between CA Siteminder & Websphere Message Br |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| soumen.smn |
 Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 11:08 pm Post subject: Integration between CA Siteminder & Websphere Message Br |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Location: Kolkata, INDIA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
It probably will work. Well as long as the JAR files needed are pretty self contained.
If not then you may have to route via an ApplicationServer (eg WAS, JBOSS etc).
IF you do go down this route, the advice given here and at the end of here
would be worth following.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| soumen.smn |
| Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Location: Kolkata, INDIA
|
I have come to know that CA SiteMinder will provide webservices to other third parties for communication. The service supports all the SiteMinder authentication schemes and custom authentication schemes. When a request is successful, the service returns a SiteMinder Session for that user.
So, is there any standard approach available that will help WMB to cache session information and further session validation for subsequent requests ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
There are a number of different approaches you can use to cache this information.
Some would suggest a Java Singleton.
Others would put it on a Queue for browsing
Others would use ESQL Shared variables.
Some might even suggest a Database (eg SolidDb)
Take your pick. They all have their own advantages and disadvantages.
The best fit will depend upon your exact requirement and only you know those. Besides, we are not here to do your job for you. If you want me to do that then my rate is a very cheap, £450.00 a day (plus tax & expenses).
Do some experimantation and make your own mind up.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
