| Author |
Message
|
| andrefb |
 Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 7:44 am Post subject: Broker V6103 and z/OS 1.11 migration - need action? |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 06 May 2010
Posts: 2
|
Hi All,
I support a message broker V6103 running on a z/OS version 1.9, and the z/OS team will migrate the O.S. to the version z/OS v 1.11 this weekend.
My question is: Am I supposed to change any broker configuration for this migration or can I assume that broker will keep working normally with the z/OS migration to V1.11?
Should I change anything like ENVFILE, BIPCNTL, etc... or is it necessary to apply any ptf/apar?
I didn't find any documentation about this migration so I appreciate any information.
Thanks in advance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fatherjack |
| Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 522
Location: Craggy Island
|
Presumably you are going to test the migration before doing it in production?
_________________
Never let the facts get in the way of a good theory. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| andrefb |
| Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 8:54 am Post subject: Broker V6103 and z/OS 1.11 migration - need action? |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 06 May 2010
Posts: 2
|
Unfortunately no Fatherjack, last week we tried in dev with JAVA version 6 and didn't work, so we decided to keep the current JAVA version (5). So we go directly to prod  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mr Butcher |
| Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 1716
|
you can check the broker prereqs and try to match with your z/OS 1.11 versions of the different components, however, to be sure i would ask IBM
_________________
Regards, Butcher |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fatherjack |
| Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 12:05 am Post subject: Re: Broker V6103 and z/OS 1.11 migration - need action? |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 522
Location: Craggy Island
|
| andrefb wrote: |
| So we go directly to prod |
I'll say a special prayer in church on Sunday for you.
_________________
Never let the facts get in the way of a good theory. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
