|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
IA9Z support pack and WMB v6.1.0.2 |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
bobbee |
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:30 pm Post subject: IA9Z support pack and WMB v6.1.0.2 |
|
|
 Knight
Joined: 20 Sep 2001 Posts: 545 Location: Tampa
|
I have sent the authors and EMAIL, but is anyone using this in the v6.1.0.2 Broker. I am trying and it just throws exceptions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bobbee |
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Knight
Joined: 20 Sep 2001 Posts: 545 Location: Tampa
|
Well, I got IA9Z working, sort of, on v6.1.0.2
I am trying to run a .bat file that will rename a file. My issue now is passing parameters to the scrpt. I can get the script to fun from the node configuration. But I am having difficulties passing parameters to the script. My next step is to build a message and pass it to the node to do this dynamically.
How do you specify the node 'Job Location' field to pass parameters to the scrpt.
when I set the value of the field to 'C:\temp\rename.bat' (without the quotes. the scrpt executes.
When I set it to 'C:\temp\rename a.txt b.txt' (with and without the quotes or 'C:\temp\rename.bat<"a.txt b.txt"' (with and without the outter quotes) it does not execute my script and hangs the execution group with JAVA errors. I have to reboot my machine to get at the EG to do anything.
If someone is using IA9Z at all I would like to chat. This SP seems to be a tempermental beast. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sridhsri |
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 297
|
I was wondering if there is a reason that you are using this SP and not using MQ triggers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bobbee |
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Knight
Joined: 20 Sep 2001 Posts: 545 Location: Tampa
|
well, that would have been the #1 option if this support pack was not available. But I would then need to pass the data in the queue, have the script read the data, parse it and then perform the rename execution. Then I would need to respond back to the flow that the process completed. This is all taken care of if this node would work as described.
I have WTX in the mix so right now that is my second option to do the rename. But this SP would have been the my pick. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sridhsri |
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 297
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|