| Author |
Message
|
| longtail |
 Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:18 am Post subject: What's the best way to create channel in this situation? |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 15
|
QM A,B,C,D are on different machines.
1.QM A sends and receives message from B,C and D.
2.There's no conversation between B,C and D. B,C and D ONLY send and receive message from QM A.
In this situation,what's best way to create queues and channels on these QM??
Thank you very much! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:20 am Post subject: Re: What's the best way to create channel in this situation? |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| longtail wrote: |
| In this situation,what's best way to create queues and channels on these QM?? |
With a script? 
I don't understand your question.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| longtail |
| Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 15
|
Sorry, What I want to say is What Kind of Channels is the best choice.
With Script or by UI ,it doesn't matter.
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| longtail wrote: |
| Sorry, What I want to say is What Kind of Channels is the best choice. |
That choice is dicated by the message flow. I'd be slightly surprised (but not astonished) if you weren't using ordinary sender/receiver channels. Or a very small cluster. But hub & spoke seems to be the arcitecture you're describing.
I still don't think I've really grasped your question, because that answer is fairly obvious. There's a complexity here I'm missing.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| longtail |
| Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 15
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| But hub & spoke seems to be the arcitecture you're describing. |
That's right! I am sorry I am a new comer to MQ, Could you explain the best design more clearly please? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| longtail wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
| But hub & spoke seems to be the arcitecture you're describing. |
That's right! I am sorry I am a new comer to MQ, Could you explain the best design more clearly please? |
The Intercommunication manual will do a far better job than I could.
Happy Reading! 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jeevan |
| Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 1432
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| longtail wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
| But hub & spoke seems to be the arcitecture you're describing. |
That's right! I am sorry I am a new comer to MQ, Could you explain the best design more clearly please? |
The Intercommunication manual will do a far better job than I could.
Happy Reading! |
Or, there shlould be a desing for QM already or ask for integration architect for a copy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Toronto_MQ |
| Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 10 Jul 2002
Posts: 263
Location: read my name
|
| Is this an exam question?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Toronto_MQ wrote: |
| Is this an exam question?? |
Not impossible..... 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
