| Author |
Message
|
| Doris |
 Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:49 am Post subject: channel doesn't start |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 7
|
Hello,
I have a problem with one of my channel.
I have one Queuemanager (A) in a HP-UX cluster and one (B) on an other HP-UX machiine. Both machines run MQ 5.2. The cluster made a switch because there was broken hardware. After that switch all other channel from a lot of machines to machine A become the status running on their own. Only this one from machine B to machine A does not start by himself and I have to start him manuell. I don't got a message in the erorfiles. The configuration of that cannel is the same like all other. What can I do? What is wrong?
Thanks for answers
Doris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| wbimb |
| Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 144
|
| try to reset the channel for the seqnum and then try starting the channels |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vennela |
| Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
| When you manually start the channel, what status is the channel in? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Doris |
| Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 7
|
Thie seqnum was my first idea. But seqnum is ok.
When I start the channel manuell, the status is running. Before I start, there is no status. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
Could it be that your channel is not triggered and all the others are ?
Check the definitions of the xmitq and compare!
Enjoy 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kevinf2349 |
| Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1311
Location: USA
|
| Quote: |
Could it be that your channel is not triggered and all the others are ?
|
Or could it be the transmission queue is triggered but the depth was > 1 and trigger type is FIRST? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Doris |
| Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 7
|
| Sorry, but there is no difference between this and other xmit queues and I think there is no trigger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kevinf2349 |
| Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1311
Location: USA
|
| Quote: |
| and I think there is no trigger |
Why only think? Display the XMITQ definition and this will confirm it for you.
If it isn't triggered then some manual intervention would be needed, either a manual start command or a start command in a script. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Doris |
| Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 7
|
| The channel is triggert. .. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kevinf2349 |
| Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1311
Location: USA
|
| Quote: |
| Or could it be the transmission queue is triggered but the depth was > 1 and trigger type is FIRST? |
Of course if you have already manually started the channel then it will be hard to tell now 
Is it working OK now? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Doris |
| Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 7
|
| Yes, it works correct, but if the cluster will switch again I will have the same problem (we tried the switch already) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bbburson |
| Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 378
Location: Nowhere near a queue manager
|
Let's go back to your original post.
| Doris wrote: |
| ...HP-UX machiine. Both machines run MQ 5.2. |
Is that really true? 5.2 has been out of support for ages now. I'd say an upgrade is in order. I'm surprised no one else brought this up in the discussion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Doris |
| Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 7
|
Yes, it is true. And I know this problem. But I didn't think, the version is so bad and I have no chance to make an update by now.
Anyhow, all! the other channel on these machines are starting on their own. And there is no difference in the configuration. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
