| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Modelling Message Flow with Rational XDE |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| javaforvivek |
 Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:57 pm Post subject: Modelling Message Flow with Rational XDE |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 282
Location: Pune,India
|
Hi,
I want to know has anybody used Rational XDE to model Message Flows?
If yes, then how to do it?
Is Rational XDE integrable with WBIMB Toolkit?
_________________
Vivek
------------------------------------------------------
...when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Does Rational XDE run on Eclipse 2.1?
If so, and only if so, it can be integrated with the Toolkit.
If you do a search here for "UML", you may find some previous discussions on using UML to model flows and sets.
The WBI Modeller and the WSAD Integration Edition can produce models that can be used to generate flows and sets.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| javaforvivek |
| Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 282
Location: Pune,India
|
The Rational XDE that I have on my machine uses eclipse 2.0.1. Will it do?
There are only two posts on UML in this forum, but none of them make any statement regarding how to use XDE for message flow modelling.
WBI Modeller can be used in this aspect.
Do you think then, that, Rational XDE is a wrong choice to model WBIMB Msg Flows?
_________________
Vivek
------------------------------------------------------
...when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| javaforvivek wrote: |
| The Rational XDE that I have on my machine uses eclipse 2.0.1. Will it do? |
It might.
| javaforvivek wrote: |
| There are only two posts on UML in this forum, but none of them make any statement regarding how to use XDE for message flow modelling. |
I didn't say they would. I said they would talk about modelling flows and sets using UML. XDE is just a way to build UML.
| javaforvivek wrote: |
WBI Modeller can be used in this aspect.
Do you think then, that, Rational XDE is a wrong choice to model WBIMB Msg Flows? |
Personally, I am not thoroughly convinced of the usefulness of models, particuarly as a code generation tool, in general.
I also consider the WBIMB flows to be models, and so I see little use in modelling a model before modeling it for real.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| javaforvivek |
| Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 282
Location: Pune,India
|
| Quote: |
I also consider the WBIMB flows to be models, and so I see little use in modelling a model before modeling it for real.
|
I have already completed development.. and now trying to build some UML Based model from already exisisting Msg Flows..!! It is just for the sake of some other technical people, who are not aware of WBIMB but aware of UML, to understand the Msg Processing Flow.
_________________
Vivek
------------------------------------------------------
...when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| javaforvivek wrote: |
| I have already completed development.. and now trying to build some UML Based model from already exisisting Msg Flows..!! It is just for the sake of some other technical people, who are not aware of WBIMB but aware of UML, to understand the Msg Processing Flow. |
Ah.
Well, activity diagrams and spreadsheets that lay out field level transformations is what I would do.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
