Author |
Message
|
jefflowrey |
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
Hrm - discint 0 eliminates my usual response.
Are there errors/messages in the logs on qmgr A?
Are you sure the channels were started when discint was set to 0? _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
carolhara wrote: |
Sender Channels are going inactive in queue manager A. |
And you're sure A's channel initiator is running normally? _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bruce2359 |
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 9471 Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
Quote: |
Are you sure the channels were started when discint was set to 0? |
Are you sure the channels were stopped and started after you made the change to DISCINT(0)? _________________ I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
bruce2359 wrote: |
Quote: |
Are you sure the channels were started when discint was set to 0? |
Are you sure the channels were stopped and started after you made the change to DISCINT(0)? |
I guess that was ambiguous.
I meant what Bruce2359 says - that discint must have a value of 0 when the channel started. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carolhara |
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Oct 2007 Posts: 56
|
Vitor, yes.. channel initiator is running.
Bruce, Jefflowrey, I think I set the discint to 0 while they were inactive, stopped the queue manager and restarted it.. you think it didn´t take effect??
Wait, they´re all 0 now. Does this mean something?
Thank you! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
It should have taken effect.... _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carolhara |
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Oct 2007 Posts: 56
|
This is the error message
Event Type: Error
Event Source: WebSphere MQ
Event Category: None
Event ID: 9604
Date: 3/3/2008
Time: 16:24:30
User: N/A
Computer: BSP8253
Description:
Channel 'C60777661.90400888.1' terminated unexpectedly
The process or thread executing channel 'C60777661.90400888.1' is no longer running. The check process system call returned 545284357 for process 5120.
No immediate action is required because the channel entry has been removed from the list of running channels. Inform the system administrator who should examine the operating system procedures to determine why the channel process has terminated. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fjb_saper |
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20756 Location: LI,NY
|
Could it be that your OS kills long running inactive processes that are not declared as daemons? You'd be better off then with a triggered channel...
 _________________ MQ & Broker admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carolhara |
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Oct 2007 Posts: 56
|
We changed the MCA type to 'thread' and now the channels are not falling anymore.
Just don´t know if we can leave it this way.
Thanks for replying! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|