| Author |
Message
|
| EricCox |
 Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 2:01 pm Post subject: Open defects on Message Broker 8 Applications & Librarie |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292
|
To all,
How can I see all the open defects that are currently open on Message Broker 8 regarding Applications and Libraries. I have the same question for the version 8 platform altogether also.
One of my team mates said that Applications and Libraries are unstable and immature and that an IBM person, unnamed, said they weren't to be used.
Is this true?
Has there been any official communication or anything indicating that the use of Applications and Libraries is not recommended? Also, has there been any communication supporting the use or recommending their use?
Thanks,
EMC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
I think that the information you have is well out of date.
Yes there were issues with Apps & Libraries but personally since 8.0.0.3 was released I have not seen any new ones.
You really should dig deeper and find out who said what and WHEN.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
There is the question of why did we need yet another way to use the message broker, when untrained developers struggle with the basics anyway... 
_________________
Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| McueMart |
| Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 29 Nov 2011
Posts: 490
Location: UK...somewhere
|
| As of 8.0.0.3 , apps and libraries seem quite stable. Im hoping by 8004 or 8005 I will be able to say the same for subflows, promoted properties and the debugger! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EricCox |
| Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:17 pm Post subject: Problems with Subflows |
|
|
Master
Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292
|
| What kind of problems are you having with subflows? We use subflows extensively. Unfortunately they are built as message flows but deployed as subflows. They do give warnings in v8x. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| NealM |
| Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 230
Location: NC or Utah (depends)
|
Regarding keeping up to date on latest broker issues, suggest you go here to sign up for email notices: http://www-01.ibm.com/software/support/einfo.html?acss=danl_214_email
Regarding subflows, we found they were more stable within Applications than when trying to share them across broker projects. Their problems with promoted properties were mostly solved with FP3, except that we had to play some remove-replace games with MQOutput nodes with promoted properties in subflows when we went to FP3.
Regarding the debugger, see if our APAR IC96566 applies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
