ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Open defects on Message Broker 8 Applications & Librarie

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Open defects on Message Broker 8 Applications & Librarie « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
EricCox
PostPosted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 2:01 pm    Post subject: Open defects on Message Broker 8 Applications & Librarie Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292

To all,

How can I see all the open defects that are currently open on Message Broker 8 regarding Applications and Libraries. I have the same question for the version 8 platform altogether also.

One of my team mates said that Applications and Libraries are unstable and immature and that an IBM person, unnamed, said they weren't to be used.

Is this true?

Has there been any official communication or anything indicating that the use of Applications and Libraries is not recommended? Also, has there been any communication supporting the use or recommending their use?

Thanks,
EMC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
smdavies99
PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Council

Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.

I think that the information you have is well out of date.
Yes there were issues with Apps & Libraries but personally since 8.0.0.3 was released I have not seen any new ones.

You really should dig deeper and find out who said what and WHEN.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995

Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zpat
PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Council

Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK

There is the question of why did we need yet another way to use the message broker, when untrained developers struggle with the basics anyway...
_________________
Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
McueMart
PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chevalier

Joined: 29 Nov 2011
Posts: 490
Location: UK...somewhere

As of 8.0.0.3 , apps and libraries seem quite stable. Im hoping by 8004 or 8005 I will be able to say the same for subflows, promoted properties and the debugger!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EricCox
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:17 pm    Post subject: Problems with Subflows Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292

What kind of problems are you having with subflows? We use subflows extensively. Unfortunately they are built as message flows but deployed as subflows. They do give warnings in v8x.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NealM
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 230
Location: NC or Utah (depends)

Regarding keeping up to date on latest broker issues, suggest you go here to sign up for email notices: http://www-01.ibm.com/software/support/einfo.html?acss=danl_214_email

Regarding subflows, we found they were more stable within Applications than when trying to share them across broker projects. Their problems with promoted properties were mostly solved with FP3, except that we had to play some remove-replace games with MQOutput nodes with promoted properties in subflows when we went to FP3.

Regarding the debugger, see if our APAR IC96566 applies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Open defects on Message Broker 8 Applications & Librarie
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.