Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:48 pm Post subject: SAN
Master
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 200
From an MQ point of view, I have a local storage on my server. I also have the SAN created on the same server. Now on SAN, I can have applications on it, I can have queue managers on it and so on. So SAN can function as a fail over if the local storage on the server is down. It also allows other servers in the LAN and WAN to access the different storages on SAN. But what if a SAN Fail?. Is a DR server a better choice?. But to switch to a DR server requires alot of procedures?. Can the business risk loosing money by waiting?.
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:31 am Post subject: Re: SAN
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 6339
masteringmq wrote:
...So SAN can function as a fail over if the local storage on the server is down. It also allows other servers in the LAN and WAN to access the different storages on SAN...
It seems to me you're talking High Availability (HA) here, at least in regard to WMQ. There are plenty of posts on this site regarding WMQ and HA, and it would be worth your time finding them. Also look at the MC91 SupportPac, which helps implement HA.
The decision whether to use HA or a completely different DR solution only is entirely dependent on business requirements. _________________ It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum