| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| What's the difference between DB2 REBIND and fmczutil rebind |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| technok |
 Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2002 5:18 am Post subject: What's the difference between DB2 REBIND and fmczutil rebind |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 14 Oct 2001
Posts: 17
Location: Hong Kong
|
I got whole bunch of FMC31050E in the fmcerr.log. 
After fmczutil rebind, all errors are gone. 
Please advise. Any response will be appreciated!
_________________
Techno K
IBM Certified MQ/WMQI Specialist |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jmac |
| Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2002 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Not being a DB2 person, I have no idea what the difference is. But the doc pretty clearly states that you should rebind with fmczutil, so that is what I always do.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vedbhat |
| Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2002 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Posts: 186
Location: Singapore
|
Hi,
I am not a DB2 expert but as I know, DB2 bind and fmczutil rebind are the same. FMCZUTIL internally issues db2 bind command.
Binding normally hleps to optimize and to have a faster access to the records in the database. When ever a change is made in the DB2 package, one need to rebind the changed package to the database. This help in improving the response time for any query and also to solve some of the existing problems.
Please have a look at the support pac for MQWF - Production Rollout consideration.
Hope this will be of help to you.
Regards
Ved
_________________
IBM Certified Solutions Expert - MQSeries Workflow
IBM Certified Specialist - MQSeries |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sshaker |
| Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2004 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 185
|
there are multiple ways of rebinding:
- fmczutil
- db2 bind commands
- fmczrdb -o b -y <configID>
I prefer doing it using fmczutil ... as I expect it to work better (if not same as other two) !
regards
_________________
shaker |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
