ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Configuration Manager Planning issue

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Configuration Manager Planning issue « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
sieijish
PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 3:03 am    Post subject: Configuration Manager Planning issue Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 67
Location: London

We have the the following WBI MB Infrastructure

Devmt Environmet
1 IBM p-615 Server

Model Environment
3 IBM p-630 Servers, Clustered.

Prod Environment
3 IBM p-650 Servers, Clustered.

And now since Configuration Manager cannot be installed on AIX machines and only one configMgr can exist on a single box, I have to request additional hardware with windows OS for hosting the Configuration Manager.

That is 3 more additional machines - one for Devmt Broker domain, Model domain & prod domain.

Isn't this an over-kill? Also it adds to the software maintenance overhead (os, db2, mq, wbimb on 3 more boxes).

Is there any better solution than going for 3 more machines?

I have seen some pointers in this forum that all the brokers can be managed from a single configuration manger? Does that solutions work without UserNameServer. Also, in that solution, how do I seperate my devmt, model & production domain?

What is the best practice for this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael Dag
PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 3:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 2607
Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)

you can manage multiple brokers from one configuration manager, however for various reasons like different environments, version control, etc I would advise against sharing a configuration managers for different environments.

if for example you had 2 development brokers they could be managed from one configuration manager
_________________
Michael



MQSystems Facebook page
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

Version 5 includes access control lists for broker security, providing very fine detail over and above the five groups in traditional broker security.

If you are willing to manage this, you can specify that user A can only work with broker 1 in Dev, and not anything in test or prod, and likewise with other users and groups and resources.

Read up on mqsicreateaclgroup and etc. in the documentation.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sieijish
PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 67
Location: London

Thanks for the suggestions.

The real issue here is additional harward & maintenance costs. Ideally, I would have used a single windows box to run 3 seperate configuration manager services to manage the 3 domains (devmt, model, prod).

Any good reason why IBM put the limitation that only a single configuration manager can run on a single box? createconfigmanager doesn't take the 'name' either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

The point of my suggestion re: access control lists is that you could then use one config manager for all three environments.

I guess I forgot to actually state my point...

The reason that the mqsicreateconfigmgr doesn't take a name parameter is exactly because you can only have one per box. I suspect that the limitation of one per box is because of the security role that the config manager plays - and the limitations in the old group/role security model. If you can only have five or six roles, and each role is uniquely determined by membership in a fixed name group... then how can you have different security policies for two config managers on the same box? And if you can't have different security policies... what good is more than one config manager?

Again, the new access control lists don't have the same restrictions.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Configuration Manager Planning issue
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.