Author |
Message
|
Manikandan |
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 8:54 pm Post subject: Messages can queue can handle |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 07 Jul 2004 Posts: 78
|
How many messages each queue on the Q Manager can handle.Is there a benchmark for this.
are there any factors we need to keep in mind for this? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mallik |
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 29 Feb 2004 Posts: 53
|
The limit is based on MAXQDEPTH attribute of the queue. The limit also depends on the disk space(you need to have sufficient disk space even though the queue has sufficent depth to hold new messages).
Browse through the forum or RTM for more detailed info. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nigelg |
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 02 Aug 2004 Posts: 1046
|
The queue attribute is MAXDEPTH.
At 5.3 there is no upper limit for the attribute, which means that you will run out of other resource before WMQ will return 2053 MQRC_Q_FULL. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EddieA |
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi
Joined: 28 Jun 2001 Posts: 2453 Location: Los Angeles
|
Quote: |
At 5.3 there is no upper limit for the attribute |
Yes there is:
Quote: |
On AIX, Compaq OpenVMS, HP-UX, Linux, OS/400, Solaris, Windows, and z/OS, specify a value in the range zero through 999 999 999.
On any other WebSphere MQ platform, specify a value in the range zero through 640 000 |
Cheers, _________________ Eddie Atherton
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V6.1
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V7.0 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nigelg |
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 02 Aug 2004 Posts: 1046
|
Thanks Eddie. What I meant was that you will never be able to reach the upper limit and get 2053 because you will run out of other resources well before you can put a billion -1 msgs on a queue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manikandan |
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 07 Jul 2004 Posts: 78
|
Thanks,those replies really answered my Questions.
Thanks,,  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|