| Author |
Message
|
| Rockon |
 Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:15 am Post subject: Deleting a cluster queue |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 43
|
I have two queue managers qma and qmb which is a part of a cluster called "Library.Cluster".I was successfully able to delete a cluster queue hosted by qma and there are no other queues in this Queue manager.i.e.qma.The problem here is that I am unable to get rid of this cluster queue from qmb,even though the hosting queue manager doesnot have this cluster queue.Is there any way to get rid of cluster queues hosted on a remote Queue manager?
p.s.just for the record there are no messages or channels that are active. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| JasonE |
| Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 1220
Location: Hursley
|
If QMA hosts a queue, and QMB knows about it, then QMB will have registered a subscription about the queue. When its deleted on QMA, QMB should have been told and cleaned up.
Check for messages on the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE on qma, ensure your channels can get running, make sure system.cluster.command.queue on both systems runs at 0 most of the time.
Something is not right with your cluster... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kevinf2349 |
| Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1311
Location: USA
|
The definition should disappear in a few days....yes....days!
I believe you could refresh the cluster and it will go sooner, but to all intents and purposes it is already deleted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JasonE |
| Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 1220
Location: Hursley
|
The act of deleting a queue should publish to the full repository the delete action, which will then forward to all subscribed parties. It normally happens very quickly, unless there are build up of messages on SYSTEM.CLUSTER.COMMAND.QUEUE'S OR S.C.TRANSMIT.QUEUE'S or channel problems.
In 90 days the object will disappear due to inactivity, but thats another issue |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kevinf2349 |
| Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1311
Location: USA
|
Jason,
Interesting. We had a pretty long delay when deleting a clustered queue a while ago (admittedly on 5.2 queue managers.....and we had the cluster with only on repository at the time  ). I don't recall exactly how long but it certainly took 'a long time' to 'disppear'.  Having said that we were having lots of fun and games with the cluster at the time.
Sorry if I led people up the wrong path.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| I_B_Skippy |
| Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Posts: 1
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
|
Jason,
Do you know where I can find more info concerning the 90 day purge of inactive objects? One of my clients experienced some downtime due to obsolete objects, and it was exactly 90 days after they (incorrectly) deleted a qmgr.
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
The Cluster Manual has all that good stuff about deleting QMs properly and 90 day expirations of unused cluster objects.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
