| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Is there a Person List API in MQ Workflow |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| FloridaSilverback |
 Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 7:09 am Post subject: Is there a Person List API in MQ Workflow |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 13 May 2004
Posts: 16
|
We are building our own thin client application that implements some of the MQ Workflow Java API's. Many of the API's are already completed. However I am working on the transfer API and I would like to present the workflow administrator with a list of valid users instead of having to key in the correct user id.
I have been looking at the Service object but I cannot find any API that returns a list of 'Persons' (Person []). It could be that I am starting in the wrong place or there isn't an API available for this purpose.
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| manoj |
| Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 30 Jan 2002
Posts: 237
Location: Virgina
|
Try this API,
Person.personsAuthorizedForMe() returns a String array of users authorized for the current person..
You can get the Person object from the Execution Service object
_________________
-manoj |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
These apis: Person.personsAuthorizedForMe() and Person.personsAuthorizedFor work fine for a user who is authorized to look at the work of "specific" users. However, if used with a person object that is authorized to "ALL" it does not return all userids.
So, I think this will most likely not work for you. To my knowledge, there is no MQWF way to get what you want.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| FloridaSilverback |
| Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 13 May 2004
Posts: 16
|
manoj, jmac Thanks.
I'll need to determine if the additional level of administration (WORKITEMS_OF...) will be implemented. If so, then I may be covered. If not, then I will need to find another way.
Thanks again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
