Author |
Message
|
RogerLacroix |
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 8:42 pm Post subject: JetStream, IBM and MQ |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 3264 Location: London, ON Canada
|
All,
I have it on good authority that IBM will be releasing a new product called JetStream (although this could be their internal name) in the near future.
Basically, JetStream will be a JMS provider. I have been told that one of the reasons for creating JetStream is that MQ s JMS provider competition (Sonic & Fiorano), talk about slow performance (header transformations) and non-pure implementation.
So, has anyone heard abut it? Does anyone have any docs they can share? How about delivery dates (support platforms)? What about a bridge between MQ and JetStream?
Can or will anyone from Hursley comment on JetStream?
Regards,
Roger Lacroix _________________ Capitalware: Transforming tomorrow into today.
Connected to MQ!
Twitter |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bduncan |
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2003 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 11 Apr 2001 Posts: 1554 Location: Silicon Valley
|
I've also been told the same thing. And the reasons you listed as the need for this product (mainly performance) are correct as well. But I'll leave it at that because the person who gave me this information wanted me to be discreet about it. But if his behavior is any indication, I doubt we'll get any official response from IBM anytime soon. It seems they want to keep this under wraps for now.  _________________ Brandon Duncan
IBM Certified MQSeries Specialist
MQSeries.net forum moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Dag |
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2003 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 2607 Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
maxis |
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2003 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 25 Jun 2002 Posts: 144
|
There was an article in Information week ... may be 6-8 weeks back. That was all about ESB .. and its players. And IBM, one of the leading middle ware s/w provider, absence in it. It had briefly indicated . what could be IBM's stratergy .. and what can be expected in the near future (obviously ESB )
M |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Dag |
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2004 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 2607 Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)
|
the words "Utility Services Bus" popped up in some documents from Sonic and TIBCO.
Found the following article from 12-Dec-2003 http://www.analystviews.com/Pages/AnalystContent/the451/the451-20031218.htm
Doesn't sound like:
"This will be a very lightweight, very high-performance messaging (product)," said Danny Sabbah, chief technology officer at IBM's software group. (quote from the previous zdnet article I posted)
Michael |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JLRowe |
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Yatiri
Joined: 25 May 2002 Posts: 664 Location: South East London
|
With the new I/O classes in Java 1.4, Java can now approach the performance and scalability of native code when it comes to file I/O and socket I/O.
So, perhaps it's finally time for a pure Java JMS provider from IBM (not counting everyplace!). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RogerLacroix |
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 3264 Location: London, ON Canada
|
Hi,
Here's an interesting article on the performance of Java against other languages (i.e. VB, C#, C, etc...)
http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=5602
Sun's Java v1.4.2 brings in great results accept for "64-bit floating point trigonometry".
Here is a summary of the article:
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc. _________________ Capitalware: Transforming tomorrow into today.
Connected to MQ!
Twitter |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JLRowe |
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Yatiri
Joined: 25 May 2002 Posts: 664 Location: South East London
|
Yeah, I saw that - very impressive.
The only reason java get's it's arse kicked in geometry, is because all the trig functions are soft coded in bytecode. Using hardware floating point instructions would give slightly different results on each platform and would not be portable! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Dag |
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 2607 Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)
|
a bit off topic maybe, but then again this is General Discussion
anybody a clue where the 'jump' from 22.1 to 57.1 came from?
especially when all the other area's have improved so much...
Just curious...
Michael |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RINU |
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 21 Jul 2004 Posts: 6
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Dag |
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 2607 Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JLRowe |
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Yatiri
Joined: 25 May 2002 Posts: 664 Location: South East London
|
Another mention of mediations from the websphere conference agenda:
http://www-306.ibm.com/services/learning/us/conf/pdfs/websphere_schedule.pdf
Extract is:
W19 WebSphere Platform Messaging Introduction, Lecture - Beginner
Simon Holdsworth, Senior Software Engineer, IBM
This session provides an overview of the new messaging technology being developed for the WebSphere
Platform, specifically as the embedded JMS provider for WAS 6.0, and describes how it differs from the support
provided in WAS 5.0. It explains the new support for additional processing capability inserted between
communicating applications in the form of Mediations. The session also shows how this technology will be the
basis for other messaging including Web services across the WebSphere platform. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Dag |
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2004 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 2607 Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)
|
jlrowe wrote: |
Another mention of mediations from the websphere conference agenda:
|
Interesting agenda! It looks like session G01 is about MQSeries.net  _________________ Michael
MQSystems Facebook page |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|