| Author |
Message
|
| koko |
 Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 9:23 am Post subject: Holosofx without MQWorkflow |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 26 Sep 2003
Posts: 206
|
| Just wondering if one can use WBI suite( Holosofx) to build process models and use software other than MQWorkflow to implement it ( I am not even aware of other alternatives to MQWF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| devin |
| Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 82
|
As of now, I dont think there is software other than MQWF to run process models (in FDL format).
Of course, there are lot of other Workflow products.
But for the process models built in Holosofx, MQ Workflow is the only runtime engine.
Anybody correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks
Devin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ratan |
| Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
I remember Jmac telling HOLOSOFX was initially built to support multiple Workflow engines, but now as it is an IBM product it will only support MQWF.
_________________
-Ratan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kriersd |
| Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 22 Jul 2002
Posts: 209
Location: IA, USA
|
Devin
My guess is that Workflow will start using BPEL instead of FDL. This standarized format will most likely be widely adapted by other vendors who have BPM tools such as Workflow. So who knows what the future holds. If that is the case then yes, the modeler could be used to create BEPL for import into other tools.
Just a guess. 
_________________
Dave Krier
IBM WebSphere MQ Workflow V3.4 Solution Designer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
But a real good guess Dave... I would be surprised if this was not the case. 
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
