|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
Channel Retries with multiple conname entries |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
JosephGramig |
Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2024 4:02 am Post subject: Channel Retries with multiple conname entries |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 1244 Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
How does the channel retry work when the CONNAME(host1,host2) targets a QMgr that could be on more then one node (as in MI configs)? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fjb_saper |
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 3:12 am Post subject: Re: Channel Retries with multiple conname entries |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20756 Location: LI,NY
|
JosephGramig wrote: |
How does the channel retry work when the CONNAME(host1,host2) targets a QMgr that could be on more then one node (as in MI configs)? |
AFAIC the entries are tried one after the other. So you should always put the most likely entry first...
Hope it helps  _________________ MQ & Broker admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JosephGramig |
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 1244 Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
@fjb_saper,
Thinking out loud, I would expect the retry logic to work the same as if there was only one target in the CONNAME. Not sure if both targets count once for a try or each target counts as a try. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bruce2359 |
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 9469 Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
Someone from IBM should be passing by shortly to clarify. _________________ I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|