| Author |
Message
|
| belchman |
 Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 11:11 am Post subject: PUB/SUB over cluster |
 |
|
Partisan
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 347
Location: Ohio, USA
|
I chose to post this to clustering using a coin flip 
I am trying to put together a POC for PUB/SUB using MQ as the broker. Here is what I have built and tested.
I have created a cluster named PUBSUB that has 2 full repositories (FRs) and 1 partial repository (PR).
I have created 3 topics that are visible on the FRs but not on the PR.
Via MQ Explorer v9, on the 2 FRs, I can issue test subscription and get two messages on each. If I do the same thing from PR, I do not get any messages.
If I perform a dis clusqmgr(*) on FR[1] I see PR.
Am I missing something? I would think I should be able to test the subscription on PR and see the same thing I see on FRs.
After this post, I will share a regular queue on the FR[1} and verify that PR can see it.
_________________
Make three correct guesses consecutively and you will establish a reputation as an expert. ~ Laurence J. Peter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 11:25 am Post subject: Re: PUB/SUB over cluster |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 8646
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| belchman wrote: |
If I do the same thing from PR, I do not get any messages.
|
Did you receive some kind of error code on the PR when you subscribed?
Any errors in the error logs for this qmgr?
_________________
“My life flows on in endless song;
How can I keep from singing?” |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| belchman |
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 347
Location: Ohio, USA
|
*Blush
It was a cluster issue. I had a bad conname value in the clusrcvr of the PR
Sorry broheims!
_________________
Make three correct guesses consecutively and you will establish a reputation as an expert. ~ Laurence J. Peter |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2018 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20252
Location: LI,NY
|
| belchman wrote: |
*Blush
It was a cluster issue. I had a bad conname value in the clusrcvr of the PR
Sorry broheims! |
Don't forget with V9 you need a bigger cluster than 3 nodes for testing. You can define cluster publication/subscription nodes in the cluster to avoid broadcasting the pub/sub messages to the full cluster. 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
