ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum IndexWebSphere Message Broker SupportIIB10 High availability - MI VS OS Cluster

Post new topicReply to topic
IIB10 High availability - MI VS OS Cluster View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
alaychem
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:20 am Post subject: IIB10 High availability - MI VS OS Cluster Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 32

We consider active passive pattren solution for IIB10 High avilability.

Our broker uses mainly MQ in\out nodes.
On production, we very rarly experience crashes (thank god), and our broker runs super critical services.

We will use the" Enhanced flexibility in interactions with WebSphere MQ" feature of IIB10.

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSMKHH_10.0.0/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/bb28660_.htm
Does anyone have experience or wise advice about what should we pick?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 4:44 pm Post subject: Re: IIB10 High availability - MI VS OS Cluster Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 19728
Location: LI,NY

alaychem wrote:
We consider active passive pattren solution for IIB10 High avilability.

Our broker uses mainly MQ in\out nodes.
On production, we very rarely experience crashes (thank god), and our broker runs super critical services.

We will use the" Enhanced flexibility in interactions with WebSphere MQ" feature of IIB10.

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSMKHH_10.0.0/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/bb28660_.htm
Does anyone have experience or wise advice about what should we pick?

Are you sure this also applies to a multi-instance qmgr/integration node?
And please don't forget to factor in the performance hit you are going to take if you go from a local queue manager to a remote one...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
alaychem
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:28 am Post subject: Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 32

Quote:
Are you sure this also applies to a multi-instance qmgr/integration node?
And please don't forget to factor in the performance hit you are going to take if you go from a local queue manager to a remote one...


No, I don't think it applies to MI. I was only describing our topology so you sages will get the picture.

Since we are going to use remote MQ regardless, the hit on our performance from MI is also considered .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:
Post new topicReply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum IndexWebSphere Message Broker SupportIIB10 High availability - MI VS OS Cluster
Jump to:



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.