| Author |
Message
|
| PeterPotkay |
 Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:41 pm Post subject: IIB Version 11? No, now it's IBM App Connect Enterprise |
 |
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
https://developer.ibm.com/integration/docs/app-connect-enterprise/faq/
| Quote: |
| IBM Integration Bus version 10 was first released in March 2015, and since then it has been constantly enhanced with new features delivered alongside maintenance as part of quarterly fix packs. The most recent fix pack was v10.0.0.11, released in November 2017. We will continue to ship fix packs for IIBv10, but there will not be an IIBv11 because the next major engineering release for the IBM Integration Bus technology is IBM App Connect Enterprise v11. |
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
Only the names have been changed to confuse the innocent.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| Only the names have been changed to confuse the innocent. |
Not quite: there is some subtlety about the configurations and capabilities.
No configurable service, it's all policies etc... 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
| Only the names have been changed to confuse the innocent. |
Not quite: there is some subtlety about the configurations and capabilities.
No configurable service, it's all policies etc... |
There are the usual changes & enhancements you'd expect v10 -> v11.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
Brokers (or "nodes") are no longer available, at least initially.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
They'll have to pry brokers and execution groups out of my cold dead hands....
_________________
Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| zpat wrote: |
| They'll have to pry brokers and execution groups out of my cold dead hands.... |
Hah! I'd heard (started) a rumor long ago that there was an effort to discontinue use of terms like "execution" and "termination" and "dead" due to their non-PC (politically correct) tone. This confirms it... or does it?
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| PeterPotkay wrote: |
| Brokers (or "nodes") are no longer available, at least initially. |
Does that mean that integration services would be deployed in 12-factor type just like microservices??
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| PeterPotkay wrote: |
| Brokers (or "nodes") are no longer available, at least initially. |
Does that mean that integration services would be deployed in 12-factor type just like microservices?? |
If a "12 factor type" is a DOCKER container (or equivalent) then yes.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| zpat wrote: |
| They'll have to pry brokers and execution groups out of my cold dead hands.... |
They already have; nodes and servers now. 
Don't worry - I'm sure they'll still run as subsystems on z/OS, and that's the only OS that really matters.......
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| souciance |
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Posts: 169
|
Well, the most interesting question surely is how will IBM deal with their licensing model if they wish for more customers to adopt a micro-services architecture with IIB? With their current model I don't think customers can just scale up and scale down on IIB in production. So if I as a customer want to create 100 docker containers during peak hours and scale down to 10 during off hours this should really not affect my license. Most likely it should be on some sort of "pay-as-go" model or some subscription fee. Anyone knows more on this?
Last edited by souciance on Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:55 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| souciance wrote: |
| Anyone knows more on this? |
Anyone who does will probably be barred from mentioning it here.
Though I do agree the licensing model is an issue in this new world, and such an obvious issue someone in IBM must have noticed it.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
