Author |
Message
|
afroz11031 |
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 10:16 pm Post subject: Integration node not visible in fixpack v10.0.0.11 |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2014 Posts: 36
|
Hi Dears,
I have applied new IIB fix pack v10.0.0.11 in Linux OS and after running mqsiprofile command while doing mqsilist , Integration node displaying.
Below is the process followed.
1. Downloaded the fix pack from ibm website for v10.0.0.11.
2. Extracted the tar file.
3. It created a directory iib-10.0.0.11.
4. As integration node is running in high availability , one Integration node is in active and another is passive.
5. set the mqsiprofile command in v10.0.0.10 and stopped the passive and active integration node.
6. logout from the user from where I executed the mqsistop.
7. login with the same user and run the mqsiprofile after going to iib-10.0.0.11/server/bin.
8. Executed the mqsilist and below error returned
BIP1281I: No integration nodes have been defined on this machine.
BIP8071I: Successful command completion.
I tried to see the broker log but do not see any information except "1518070563: Error: Cannot assign requested address" which seems something else.
I have followed the IBM infocenter (https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSMKHH_10.0.0/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/bh45510_.htm).
Please note the same process is working in other environment where we do not have HA (high availability) .
Please do the needful.
Thanks
Afroz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
abhi_thri |
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 17 Jul 2017 Posts: 516 Location: UK
|
Quote: |
BIP1281I: No integration nodes have been defined on this machine.
BIP8071I: Successful command completion. |
The BIP msg you quoted, is that the same on both passive and active nodes?
Also any specific reason that you are running the mqsiprofile explicitly? usually it is run as part of the one of the application's user profile files. Anyway if you run 'mqsiservice -v' that you tell you which version is currently in use. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
afroz11031 |
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2014 Posts: 36
|
mqsiprofile is not set at the startup of login to Linux server so to execute any mqsi command this profile needs to set. After setting the profile from new fix pack it will display the new version that I know but the issue is in new version no integration node is displaying. However the same is displaying for the previous version. I am trying to find out the root cause from broker log but no getting the proper error. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
afroz11031 |
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2014 Posts: 36
|
Dear,
Can you please advise on this issue.
Thanks
Afroz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fjb_saper |
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20729 Location: LI,NY
|
Have you run mqsilist -a ? _________________ MQ & Broker admin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zpat |
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5859 Location: UK
|
My understanding is that should you wish to install a new fixpack level of IIB into a new directory, that you first (re) install the base version into that directory then install the fixpack into the same directory.
You should not just install the fixpack by itself into a new directory. _________________ Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
abhi_thri |
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 17 Jul 2017 Posts: 516 Location: UK
|
Quote: |
BIP1281I: No integration nodes have been defined on this machine. |
This is expected on the passive node as the integration node is available on the active one, so as I mentioned earlier are you seeing this on both passive and active nodes?
@zpat,
In IIB 10 the fixpacks are standalone installations, i.e there is no concept of base version. eg:- 10.0.0.10 and 10.0.0.11 can coexist on the same server on different folders and one can switch the installed node between the versions simply by loading the corresponding profile and restarting the node. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
afroz11031 |
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2014 Posts: 36
|
@abhi_thri - Yes I am getting same error even for active integration node. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
abhi_thri |
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 17 Jul 2017 Posts: 516 Location: UK
|
That is strange...have you done a similar upgrade successfully before, eg:- upgraded 10.0.0.9 to 10.0.0.10 on active/passive nodes without any issues? If so it might worth reviewing the installation steps used for that upgrade with the current one, in case there are any slight differences.
We've upgraded from 10.0.0.3 through to 10.0.0.7 on active/passive configuration without any issues.
Also worth comparing the directory permissions between 10.0.0.10 and 10.0.0.11. If nothing helps then I guess it is PMR time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
afroz11031 |
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2014 Posts: 36
|
Thanks abhi_thri for your prompt response. No I have not done earlier for HA...I compared with the previous version directory and all the permission set is same ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zpat |
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5859 Location: UK
|
abhi_thri wrote: |
Quote: |
BIP1281I: No integration nodes have been defined on this machine. |
This is expected on the passive node as the integration node is available on the active one, so as I mentioned earlier are you seeing this on both passive and active nodes?
@zpat,
In IIB 10 the fixpacks are standalone installations, i.e there is no concept of base version. eg:- 10.0.0.10 and 10.0.0.11 can coexist on the same server on different folders and one can switch the installed node between the versions simply by loading the corresponding profile and restarting the node. |
It's always been possible to install multiple versions / fixpack levels of IIB on the same server in different folders.
I think what you are saying is fixpacks are now fully rebased versions not requiring the original version to be installed beforehand. Is there an IBM statement to that effect? _________________ Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PeterPotkay |
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 7719
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
zpat |
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5859 Location: UK
|
Thanks.
Don't forget to do the "-f all" ... on the broker to allow it to use the latest function. _________________ Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
afroz11031 |
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Jan 2014 Posts: 36
|
Hi All,
Finally got the solution and it is all about mqsiprofile,, going to the configuration mentioned in mqsiprofile tells all about the issue why the above error mentioned in my 1st statement throwing. I will post what I have changed to make this issue resolved in my next post.
However thanks to all to provide your input.
Thanks
Afroz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|