| Author |
Message
|
| MakeItEasy |
 Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 8:22 am Post subject: Bar deployment Issue |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 31 Jul 2016
Posts: 7
|
Schema Path is set up in the ESQL, but BAR file is not getting deployed because it displays error that Function are not created.
I have given the schema path. The functions are defined in a static library and getting called from another static library.
The Scenario is like this , there is an Application which uses subflow defined in static library and that subflow esqls in turn call functions defined in another common static library. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| adubya |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 377
Location: GU12, UK
|
Presumably all your dependencies are set correctly in toolkit and you're not getting any errors in the toolkit workspace ?
How are you creating the bar file ? And what is the exact error at deployment time ?
Broker/IIB version ?
_________________
Independent Middleware Consultant
andy@knownentity.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MakeItEasy |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 31 Jul 2016
Posts: 7
|
BIP2558E
Also I've cleaned the workspace many times .. there are no issues .. I am able to build the bar .
I am doing Inline compilation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| adubya |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 377
Location: GU12, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MakeItEasy |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 31 Jul 2016
Posts: 7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| adubya |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 377
Location: GU12, UK
|
So you're doing a drag/drop deploy from toolkit ? Dragging the application to the target Integration server ?
_________________
Independent Middleware Consultant
andy@knownentity.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MakeItEasy |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 31 Jul 2016
Posts: 7
|
Creating bar first using toolkit
and then deploying the bar |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| adubya |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 377
Location: GU12, UK
|
If you do a drag/drop deploy of the application do you get the same error ?
_________________
Independent Middleware Consultant
andy@knownentity.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MakeItEasy |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 31 Jul 2016
Posts: 7
|
By default when you drag/deploy in toolkit .. inline compilation will not be there .
But I need to do the inline compilation due to the subflow we are using in the application otherwise it will give an other issue.
So if I do drag/drop( no inline compilation) it shows some other error. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
| MakeItEasy wrote: |
| IIB V9.0 |
Which Fixpack?
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Craig B |
| Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2016 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 316
Location: UK
|
Earlier in the thread you mentioned "I am doing Inline compilation". What types of subflows are using? The old style ".msgflow" version which would get inlined? Or are you using the ".subflow" deployable version that were introduced in V8? The reason for asking is that if a subflow references ESQL then it cannot inline the ESQL as part of the node details. Whereas if you have .msgflow subflows these will get inlined and then the ESQL they reference can get inlined.
To be honest trying to solve a BIP2558 deploy problem through forum updates is going to be tricky. If the Toolkit thinks everything is valid then that is a good start. The run-time validation is far more thorough as it actually has to run what it is given.
If I was analysing this myself I would be looking at the full details of the BIP2558 and then comparing this with the contents of the BAR that had been sent to the integration server.
The last update on this thread stated "What fixpack?"
This would be useful information as well.
_________________
Regards
Craig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
