| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| WMB: The given SOAPAction x does not match an operation |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| Mhalaise |
 Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:07 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 02 Mar 2016
Posts: 9
|
I'm really clutching at straws now but: the SOAPAction in the wsdl file(s) is blank (""). However, by invoking a dummy webservice that simply dumps the content of the ${Root} and ${LocalEnvironment} I can see SOAPAction has been populated (with the very value that is then "rejected" with the error message I am seeing). Why is that being set when the wsdl sets that to blank? Is this some sort of default behaviour with our antique WMB?
I tried, just out of interest, really, setting HTTPRequestHeader.SOAPAction to "" but that opened up a whole new can of worms which I yet to make sense of (basically, the XML document prologue wasn't liked)...
Last edited by Mhalaise on Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:14 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| Mhalaise wrote: |
I'm really clutching at straws now but: the SOAPAction in the wsdl file(s) is blank (""). However, by invoking a dummy webservice that simply dumps the content of the ${Root} and ${LocalEnvironment} I can see SOAPAction has been populated (with the very value that is then "rejected" with the error message I am seeing. Why is that being set when the wsdl sets that to blank? Is this some sort of default behaviour with our antique WMB?
I tried, just out of interest, really, setting HTTPRequestHeader.SOAPAction to "" but that opened up a whole new can of worms which I yet to make sense of (basically, the XML document prologue wasn't liked)... |
Have you tried setting the SOAP Action in the local environment override field? 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mhalaise |
| Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 02 Mar 2016
Posts: 9
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| Mhalaise wrote: |
I'm really clutching at straws now but: the SOAPAction in the wsdl file(s) is blank (""). However, by invoking a dummy webservice that simply dumps the content of the ${Root} and ${LocalEnvironment} I can see SOAPAction has been populated (with the very value that is then "rejected" with the error message I am seeing. Why is that being set when the wsdl sets that to blank? Is this some sort of default behaviour with our antique WMB?
I tried, just out of interest, really, setting HTTPRequestHeader.SOAPAction to "" but that opened up a whole new can of worms which I yet to make sense of (basically, the XML document prologue wasn't liked)... |
Have you tried setting the SOAP Action in the local environment override field? |
That is actually what I wanted (or, rather, hoped) to do but all references I can find for WMB 6.1 LocalEnvironment do not mention SOAPAction. The only reference I could find was in the HTTPRequestHeader. Kind of clutching at straws with a blindfold on. It could be the searches I'm doing but a bit flummoxed at the moment... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
Well. There's your problem.
Insist on migrating to a supported version, or find another job.
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mhalaise |
| Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 02 Mar 2016
Posts: 9
|
Yep, I think I agree, mqjeff. This is a battle I cannot win. Too many odds stacked against me. Your "find another job" made me laugh 
Ok, all, I'm going to drop this now, thanks so much for all your guidance, etc. but I think it's time to give up on WMB (6.1). Sadly, there's only a snowball in hell's chance of getting a supported version now (long story short, the company hosting WMB are being dropped, as is our long faithful mainframe, in favour of a Windows/Linux *hiss* hosted off-the-shelf *yuk* product). So, yep, maybe it really is time for a "look elsewhere" for interesting work |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
