| Author |
Message
|
| akil |
 Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2015 10:59 pm Post subject: IIB9: RouteToLabel |
 |
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 338
Location: Mumbai
|
Hi
Is there a limit to the number of labels that can be present in a flow ? Can it have 50, 100 , 200 etc?
_________________
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2015 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
The most I've used is 20 and that was with V5/V6.
If you really want to know (and not from some guys on the internet) then raise a PMR and get the official answer.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
Also please consider the maintainability and testing when having a lot of targets for route to Label... + memory implications etc...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| akil |
| Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 338
Location: Mumbai
|
| smdavies99 wrote: |
The most I've used is 20 and that was with V5/V6.
If you really want to know (and not from some guys on the internet) then raise a PMR and get the official answer.
|
Ok, will raise a PMR..
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| Also please consider the maintainability and testing when having a lot of targets for route to Label... + memory implications etc... |
The scenario is to call an external service on the completion of a flow. The external service to be called varies by the customer, and there could be some 100 odd customers.
Hence the question..
_________________
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2015 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
| akil wrote: |
The scenario is to call an external service on the completion of a flow. The external service to be called varies by the customer, and there could be some 100 odd customers.
|
And the post external service processing differs for each customer?
And the external calls are totally different?
If might be better to look as some sort of pattern in the services and then
create separate flows for service types and call them using MQ in a request/reply basis.
The more you can 'commodify' the better (IMHO)
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| akil |
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 338
Location: Mumbai
|
Yeah.. the WSDL's are different, the payloads are different, the way to decode the reply is different ..
We are attempting using XSL's to create the requests, that'll help us use a single sub-flow , with different XSL names ( as that can be set dynamically via the LE ) ..
Decoding the reply, to figure out whether the reply indicates a success or a failure, will require some sort of ESQL or JCN code.. I've not been able to figure out how to specify the the ESQL module or Java module dynamically...and so the fall-back on RouteToLabel..
_________________
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
The reply should have a unique root element name, even if it's only the namespace that's unique.
Based on that you can call an appropriate routine to do process the reply.
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| akil |
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 338
Location: Mumbai
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
The reply should have a unique root element name, even if it's only the namespace that's unique.
Based on that you can call an appropriate routine to do process the reply. |
Yes, that's what I was using the RouteToLabel for , instead of putting up a whole bunch of case / when statements, I thought I'll just set the destination list, and put label nodes...
_________________
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
If you can group them into families - based on customer or etc, you can use a more maintainable combination of labels and case/if-else statements.
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
