| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| mainframe MQ VS UNIX MQ.. |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| rajeshmq1 |
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2015 1:11 am Post subject: mainframe MQ VS UNIX MQ.. |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 30 May 2015
Posts: 1
|
| Please share me some difference between mainframe MQ and UNIX MQ.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| exerk |
| Posted: Sat May 30, 2015 1:52 am Post subject: Re: mainframe MQ VS UNIX MQ.. |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| rajeshmq1 wrote: |
| Please share me some difference between mainframe MQ and UNIX MQ.. |
They have a different code base, they run on different hardware, and there's a huge difference in cost...
...seriously, there is a wealth of information, freely available, for you to do your own research and not have a bunch of strangers on the internet do it for you 
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:34 am Post subject: Re: mainframe MQ VS UNIX MQ.. |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| rajeshmq1 wrote: |
| Please share me some difference between mainframe MQ and UNIX MQ.. |
You want some difference, not many differences?
One runs on mainframe. One runs on Unix. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
There is a difference in the default syncpoint option! There are some unique features such as queue sharing groups (sysplex)
I would say that mainframe MQ tends to lag distributed in terms of feature release dates.
Mainframes in general can cope with higher loads, and are more stable.
I would generally trust one mainframe to be good enough for most purposes, whereas I would always want a cluster of Unix hosts (and I don't trust Windows at all).
_________________
Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| zpat wrote: |
There is a difference in the default syncpoint option! There are some unique features such as queue sharing groups (sysplex)
I would say that mainframe MQ tends to lag distributed in terms of feature release dates.
Mainframes in general can cope with higher loads, and are more stable.
I would generally trust one mainframe to be good enough for most purposes, whereas I would always want a cluster of Unix hosts (and I don't trust Windows at all). |
If the OP's use of "mainframe" means MQ on z/OS, then Parallel Sysplex offers Queue Sharing Groups. If the OP's use of "mainframe" means MQ on zLinux, then no.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
