| Author |
Message
|
| akil |
 Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 11:42 am Post subject: IIB9: Validation Node / XMLNSC domain. |
 |
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 338
Location: Mumbai
|
Hi
Is it possible to figure out why a validate node fails for a XMLNSC message?
I have a message flow , which invokes a sub-flow, the first node of the sub-flow is a validate node, set to check the domain (XMLNSC) and the model , it is configured for content (tried content & value as well with the same result ).
I get the following trace , it is a bit cryptic as it does not tell me what was the reason the validation node failed.
Is it because the message does not have any specific namespace defined?
| Code: |
2014-11-09 01:09:00.868291 10725 RecoverableException BIP2230E: Error detected whilst processing a message in node 'gen.OnlineRechargeService.rbl/otp/validateOTP.Validate'.
The message broker detected an error whilst processing a message in node 'gen.OnlineRechargeService.rbl/otp/validateOTP.Validate'. An exception has been thrown to cut short the processing of the message.
See the following messages for details of the error.
2014-11-09 01:09:00.868292 10725 RecoverableException BIP4162E: A non-matching message has been rejected by Validate node or Check node 'gen.OnlineRechargeService.rbl/otp/validateOTP.Validate'. Expected values: domain ''XMLNSC''; set ''''; type ''''. Actual values received: domain ''XMLNSC''; set ''''; type ''''.
The Validate node or Check node 'gen.OnlineRechargeService.rbl/otp/validateOTP.Validate' detected that the input message did not meet the specified criteria, and that a message flow processing node is not attached to its failure terminal. An exception has been generated.
Identify the reason why invalid messages are being generated or sent into the broker, and correct the problem. Ensure that you have specified the properties of the Validate node or Check node correctly, and redeploy the message flow.
|
_________________
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
The fine detail will be in the ExceptionList
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| shashivarungupta |
| Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 1343
Location: Floating in space on a round rock.
|
Lately I faced the similar kind of exception while validation of the message.
Try setting the 'XMLNSC : For XML messages (namespace aware, validation, low memory use)' as 'Domain' value in the 'Validation' Node.
Rest Uncheck the fields, unless you have Message Model/Message Set or other things to check as per 'Basic' properties of 'Validation' Node.
(this way it worked for me, it might not be necessary that my requirement of validation would match with yours).
_________________
*Life will beat you down, you need to decide to fight back or leave it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kimbert |
| Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 5542
Location: Southampton
|
Check the docs - 'Content' is not supported by XMLNSC. You should use either 'None' or 'Content and Value'.
shashivarungupta is correct - in v8 and v9 the 'Message Set' property should not be used unless the schemas were deployed in a message set.
_________________
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way you're a mile away, and you have their shoes too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| akil |
| Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 338
Location: Mumbai
|
Does the Validation node check the Properties.MessageType ?
It looks like if the Properties folder is empty (because of a mistake in an earlier mapping node), the validation node returns an error such as this.
_________________
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kimbert |
| Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 5542
Location: Southampton
|
It does, but only if you tick the 'Check type' ( 'Check Model' in v9 ) check box.
_________________
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way you're a mile away, and you have their shoes too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
