| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| RFE - Application Activity Trace support for z/OS |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| tczielke |
 Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 8:02 am Post subject: RFE - Application Activity Trace support for z/OS |
 |
|
Guardian
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 941
Location: Illinois, USA
|
Hello,
Please vote for the RFE, if you would find this helpful.
Headline: Application Activity Trace support for z/OS
Link: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=56321
Description:
Please provide the Application Activity Trace tool on z/OS.
Use Case:
I have recently started using more the MQ AAT (Application Activity Trace) on distributed, and with a few tweaks to the supplied amqsact source code, this is a very nice and powerful tool for debugging and MQ application review.
I noticed in the MQ manual that the AAT was not delivered for z/OS. Perhaps this was due to this data being available through SMF. However, for consistency sake and ease of use, it would be very helpful if the AAT was supported on z/OS, as well.
Business Justification:
For consistency sake and ease of use, it would be very helpful if the AAT was supported on z/OS, as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
If I had to guess, I'd guess that the response will be to use GTF for traces. GTF (Generalized Trace Facility) has been a all-powerful mainstay trace tool for decades on z/OS and its predecessors.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| tczielke |
| Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guardian
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 941
Location: Illinois, USA
|
The main advantages I see of AAT over the MQ mainframe GTF tracing or distributed strmqtrc tracing is the following:
1. Trace data is formatted into human readable text.
2. Trace data can be easily grouped by selection criteria (i.e. application name, pid, tid, conname, channel name, etc.).
3. One line summary of each API call.
I personally find the distributed strmqtrc tracing more easily to use and robust than the mainframe GTF tracing for MQ. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
