Author |
Message
|
iberejr |
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:31 am Post subject: AMQ9213 Communications error in getpeername |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 24 Feb 2014 Posts: 3
|
Hi, I am a MQ administrator, and also a network guy, and one of my MQs start to flood my logs with 3 or 4 occurrences of AMQ9213 and AMQ9492. The messagens seems to go to the other side, despite that every day we had some kind of outage, or slow throughput
I realize that 107 (X'6B') means ENOTCONN - Transport endpoint is not connected, and I saw here in this forum the thread: "AMQ 9213 for amqrmppa" but I cannot figure out why this is happening, or how can I troubleshoot this
The log messages are:
----- amqrmrsa.c : 524 --------------------------------------------------------
02/24/2014 12:23:01 PM - Process(21271.1863529) User(mqm) Program(amqrmppa)
Host(xxxxmq.xxxx.br)
AMQ9213: A communications error for TCP/IP occurred.
EXPLANATION:
An unexpected error occurred in communications.
ACTION:
The return code from the TCP/IP (getpeername) call was 107 (X'6B'). Record
these values and tell the systems administrator.
----- amqccita.c : 1897 -------------------------------------------------------
02/24/2014 12:23:01 PM - Process(21271.1863529) User(mqm) Program(amqrmppa)
Host(xxxxmq.xxxx.br)
AMQ9492: The TCP/IP responder program encountered an error.
EXPLANATION:
The responder program was started but detected an error.
ACTION:
Look at previous error messages in the error files to determine the error
encountered by the responder program. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JosephGramig |
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 1244 Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
What platform and fix level of OS?
What version and fix level of MQ?
What do your channel and TCP stanzas say (that's in your qm.ini file)? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
iberejr |
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 24 Feb 2014 Posts: 3
|
Hi, I am running a:
Name: WebSphere MQ
Version: 7.0.1.3
CMVC level: p701-103-100813
BuildType: IKAP - (Production)
in:
mqconfig: V3.7 analyzing Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.1
(Santiago) settings for WebSphere MQ V7.0
System V Semaphores
semmsl (sem:1) 500 semaphores IBM>=500 PASS
semmns (sem:2) 11558 of 256000 semaphores (4%) IBM>=256000 PASS
semopm (sem:3) 250 operations IBM>=250 PASS
semmni (sem:4) 105 of 1024 sets (10%) IBM>=1024 PASS
System V Shared Memory
shmmax 68719476736 bytes IBM>=268435456 PASS
shmmni 123 of 4096 sets (3%) IBM>=4096 PASS
shmall 130530 of 4294967296 pages (0%) IBM>=2097152 PASS
System Settings
file-max 8096 of 524288 files (1%) IBM>=524288 PASS
tcp_keepalive_time 300 seconds IBM<=300 PASS
Current User Limits (mqm)
nofile (-Hn) 10240 files IBM>=10240 PASS
nofile (-Sn) 10240 files IBM>=10240 PASS
nproc (-Hu) 122 of 4096 processes (2%) IBM>=4096 PASS
nproc (-Su) 122 of 4096 processes (2%) IBM>=4096 PASS
And in mq.ini, I had only these lines for channels:
mq.ini:
TCP:
Port=1414
KeepAlive=YES
CHANNELS:
MaxInitiators=100
MaxActiveChannels=1000
MaxChannels=1000 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JosephGramig |
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 1244 Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
You are way behind on maintenance, so apply that.
And add the following two lines to your Channel stanzas:
Code: |
AdoptNewMCACheck=ALL
AdoptNewMCA=ALL
|
This should help with channel operation. Not sure it will fix your specific issue. Of course, you have to stop/start the Qmgr to have changes take effect. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
iberejr |
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 24 Feb 2014 Posts: 3
|
Hi Joseph, I added the two AdoptNewMCA lines in mq.ini and restart my mq, and the errors still happening...
Any other idea ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
iberejr wrote: |
Any other idea ? |
JosephGramig wrote: |
You are way behind on maintenance, so apply that |
 _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JosephGramig |
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 1244 Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
Do you need me to Google the link to the fixes for you?
And if you open a PMR, they will want you to apply maintenance to RHEL if you need it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|