| Author |
Message
|
| EricCox |
 Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:25 pm Post subject: Default Values in a mapping node using DFDL for Output |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292
|
To all,
It is my understanding that the Default value showing in the DFDL Message Model is currently not working and will be fixed in a later implementation of the DFDL parser.
Because of this how can I achieve the same behavior in the Mapping Node? Can I use some custom esql? Does anyone have an example of how to do this?
I don't see any example of how to do this in the documentation.
Thanks,
EMC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
use a function like coalesce...
if you plan it nicely you can reuse the same function over and over again, passing the 2 arguments....
Have fun 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| dogorsy |
| Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 12:54 am Post subject: Re: Default Values in a mapping node using DFDL for Output |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 13 Mar 2013
Posts: 553
Location: Home Office
|
| EricCox wrote: |
To all,
It is my understanding that the Default value showing in the DFDL Message Model is currently not working and will be fixed in a later implementation of the DFDL parser.
Because of this how can I achieve the same behavior in the Mapping Node? Can I use some custom esql? Does anyone have an example of how to do this?
I don't see any example of how to do this in the documentation.
Thanks,
EMC |
what version of WMB are you using ? I have used DFDL defaulting and it works fine for me. What makes you think it does not ? I know it did not work in 8.0.0.0 but was fixed in 8.0.0.1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EricCox |
| Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 6:21 am Post subject: Reading and Try Again |
|
|
Master
Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292
|
FJ,
Happy New Year FJ.
After reading more on Friday I see how they want an ESQL Procedure and/or Function to provide this behavior.
And we are on 8.0.0.2. I will try it again to see if DFDL Default Value is working.
Thanks very much,
EMC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:51 am Post subject: Re: Reading and Try Again |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| EricCox wrote: |
FJ,
Happy New Year FJ.
After reading more on Friday I see how they want an ESQL Procedure and/or Function to provide this behavior.
And we are on 8.0.0.2. I will try it again to see if DFDL Default Value is working.
Thanks very much,
EMC |
Make sure your effective level is at 8.0.0.2 as well!
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EricCox |
| Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:29 am Post subject: Meaning |
|
|
Master
Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292
|
FJ,
What do you mean 'effective level'?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
look at the output from 'mqsireportbroker'
then look at the options for mqsichangebroker especially '-f'
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EricCox |
| Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:35 am Post subject: effective level |
|
|
Master
Joined: 08 Apr 2011
Posts: 292
|
Fixpack capability level = '8.0.0.2' (effective level '8.0.0.2')
FYI |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:50 am Post subject: Re: effective level |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
| EricCox wrote: |
Fixpack capability level = '8.0.0.2' (effective level '8.0.0.2')
FYI |
That is good to know. Just remember to do a mqsichangebroker <broker> -f All
after you upgrade to 8.0.0.3
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
