| Author |
Message
|
| vennela |
 Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 1:02 pm Post subject: IBM Integration Bus GA ed ? |
 |
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
24th June I thought.
I am not now nor have I ever been privy to IBM's release schedule.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| iShakir |
| Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 47
|
| A simple google lead me to the page you posted. There is a "Planned Availability Date" section, which says that the release date is June 14th. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
| iShakir wrote: |
| A simple google lead me to the page you posted. There is a "Planned Availability Date" section, which says that the release date is June 14th. |
Which might very well be different from the date when it is available electronically.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| iShakir |
| Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 47
|
| smdavies99 wrote: |
| iShakir wrote: |
| A simple google lead me to the page you posted. There is a "Planned Availability Date" section, which says that the release date is June 14th. |
Which might very well be different from the date when it is available electronically. |
It specifically states that electronic distribution is on June 14th, I'm afraid the op will have to wait until then  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vennela |
| Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
I missed the date in the link I posted
Thanks for pointing me to that |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| naio |
| Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 08 Nov 2012
Posts: 82
|
Could anyone download it?
I am still redirected to WMB V8.
thanks in advance.
_________________
"God is in his heaven all's right with the world" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| lancelotlinc |
| Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 4941
Location: Bloomington, IL USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| naio |
| Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 08 Nov 2012
Posts: 82
|
Thanks lancelotlinc.
_________________
"God is in his heaven all's right with the world" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| lancelotlinc |
| Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 4941
Location: Bloomington, IL USA
|
| naio wrote: |
| Thanks lancelotlinc. |
You're welcome. I wouldn't bother trying it out until at least Fixpack 2 is ready for it. V8.0.0.2 is still having fundamental problems with the artifact organization (Application/Library/Subflows). Until that issue gets fixed and migrated to V9, you won't be able to do a whole lot of V9 things anyway: its pretty much the same toolkit as V8.
Like buying a car, do you want a 2014 Honda Civic or a 2015 Honda Civic? Each model looks the same, drives, the same, gets pretty much the same gas mileage. Just that the 2015 model is ready for firmware updates that the 2014 model can't use. The firmware is the same in both cars until the update is ready, which won't be for at least another year. So better wait and save more money first, then buy the 2015 when the firmware update is out.
_________________
http://leanpub.com/IIB_Tips_and_Tricks
Save $20: Coupon Code: MQSERIES_READER |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| naio |
| Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 08 Nov 2012
Posts: 82
|
Thanks,
I was said that a client already have it, and wanted to do some mock test in the incoming months. So I wanted to have a look at it, but now I am a bit suspicious concerning the fact that they "really" have it.
thanks again lancelotic
Naio
_________________
"God is in his heaven all's right with the world" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
It's entirely possible that customers have a beta copy.
Using any software release at GA is always a question of risk analysis.
IIB v9.0 does things that are hard to do in MB v8. Even if they end up being buggy, it may be easier to adopt IIB for those things than adding function in v8. But you won't know until you try it.
I'd never reject out of hand using something that was GA'd, simply because it was GA'd. I'd reject moving it into production immediately without driving cause, and even then I'd make sure that driving cause had been regression tested... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| naio |
| Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 08 Nov 2012
Posts: 82
|
I will investigate a bit more, and still wait until june 28th, to see the first release version to give it a try in a DEV environment.
Thanks you for the data and advices!
naio
_________________
"God is in his heaven all's right with the world" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| broker_new |
| Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yatiri
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 614
Location: Washington DC
|
Of course it will be buggy....lot of lessons learnt especially with v8.0...we will wait until fixpack 1 or 2 released and pretty excited to see the product evolution as the powerful integration bus. Just curious to know why it re-branded without WebSphere in it..any specific reason?
_________________
IBM ->Let's build a smarter planet |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
| broker_new wrote: |
| Just curious to know why it re-branded without WebSphere in it..any specific reason? |
My take on this is that there are far too many products with the 'WebSphere' branding (and other IBM Brands for that matter) that it gets really confusing for new customers to find the particular thing they want.
don't get me started on how you go about explaining PVU's to a new customer.
 often it leads to  swiftly followed by  and 
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
