ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » What is the preferred method for handling translation tables

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 What is the preferred method for handling translation tables « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
jrsetters
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:03 am    Post subject: What is the preferred method for handling translation tables Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 72
Location: Cincinnati, OH

We have a number of message flows that depend on translation tables for data manipulation either in eSQL or mapping nodes. Currently we handle this in the message flow, which is less than ideal because it means changing and recompiling the flow each time an external change is needed. This creates inflexibility for us because these situations require following a change management process that's really designed to support more fundamental changes than just data translation.

My primary thoughts were either a file input node or a table in a database that is read at the beginning of the message flow, but I thought I would run it by you folks to see what your experiences and thoughts were.

Any input is appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:14 am    Post subject: Re: What is the preferred method for handling translation ta Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

jrsetters wrote:
My primary thoughts were either a file input node or a table in a database that is read at the beginning of the message flow, but I thought I would run it by you folks to see what your experiences and thoughts were.


Database table. With one of the available cacheing strategies to keep I/O down.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mqjeff
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

WebSphere Operational Decision Management?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

mqjeff wrote:
WebSphere Operational Decision Management?




If you have the budget for it....
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » What is the preferred method for handling translation tables
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.