| Author |
Message
|
| smdavies99 |
 Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:48 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
| Michael Dag wrote: |
you are forgetting v1 MQIntegrator  |
cough-cough, the less said about that the better don't you think?
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mqmatt |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 1213
Location: Hursley, UK
|
| PeterPotkay wrote: |
| So much for the streak of not changing the product's name constantly....sigh. |
Speaking personally (the name wasn't my decision!) I think the new name is way better. MB's done more than messaging for years now (think files, DB, streams, events, etc.), so "integration" gives it a much more any-to-any feel.
Also "bus" suggests a flexible enough architectural style, and also helps to distinguish it from an edge gateway.
By the way, we've been pretty careful to ensure existing MB V8 and earlier commands, scripts etc. continue to work as-is, so any resistance to the new name will be purely non-technical  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| adubya |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 377
Location: GU12, UK
|
| FWIW I agree that the name change is positive and will hopefully lead to more IIB sales and work for us all |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
Guess we need the description of this forum to be updated as well.
| Quote: |
WebSphere Message Broker Support
Covers WebSphere Message Broker products including WBI, WMQI, WMB, MQSI.
|
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| adubya |
| Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 377
Location: GU12, UK
|
| Any plans for a "Developer Edition" ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqmatt |
| Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 1213
Location: Hursley, UK
|
| adubya wrote: |
| Any plans for a "Developer Edition" ? |
Yes, we're planning this for shortly after GA. Freely downloadable single package containing everything you need. We're also hopeful to allow it to be used in production too, albeit limited (e.g. 1TPS). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| adubya |
| Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 377
Location: GU12, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqmatt |
| Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 1213
Location: Hursley, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Michael Dag |
| Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 13 Jun 2002
Posts: 2607
Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam)
|
| mqmatt wrote: |
| adubya wrote: |
| Any plans for a "Developer Edition" ? |
Yes, we're planning this for shortly after GA. Freely downloadable single package containing everything you need. We're also hopeful to allow it to be used in production too, albeit limited (e.g. 1TPS). |
_________________
Michael
MQSystems Facebook page |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| broker_new |
| Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yatiri
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 614
Location: Washington DC
|
Shame that we've JUST moved to 8...waste of time and money  
_________________
IBM ->Let's build a smarter planet |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| broker_new |
| Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yatiri
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 614
Location: Washington DC
|
I don't really understand how this IBM branding really put on paper.... especially WMB...
When message broker was stand alone(not on WAS) its called WebSphere Message Broker,now when it is on top of WebSphere Application server it is called Integration Bus..interesting!!!
_________________
IBM ->Let's build a smarter planet |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mgk |
| Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Posts: 1642
|
| Quote: |
| now when it is on top of WebSphere Application server it is called Integration Bus |
I'm not sure where you got that idea. Integration Bus is not built on top of WAS - it has a standalone runtime. Migration from WMB 6.1, 7 or 8 to IIB 9 is just as easy as it was from WMB 6.1 or 7 to WMB 8.
Kind regards,
_________________
MGK
The postings I make on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mb01mqbrkrs |
| Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 18 Nov 2011
Posts: 48
|
| mgk wrote: |
| Migration from WMB 6.1, 7 or 8 to IIB 9 is just as easy as it was from WMB 6.1 or 7 to WMB 8 |
Interesting - so you're supporting migrations from three levels behind now? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqmatt |
| Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 1213
Location: Hursley, UK
|
| mb01mqbrkrs wrote: |
| mgk wrote: |
| Migration from WMB 6.1, 7 or 8 to IIB 9 is just as easy as it was from WMB 6.1 or 7 to WMB 8 |
Interesting - so you're supporting migrations from three levels behind now? |
Well, pragmatics really... V9 is planned for June, yet V6.1 goes out of support in September. It makes sense they have an option of going straight to the latest and greatest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| mqmatt wrote: |
| It makes sense they have an option of going straight to the latest and greatest. |
I am intrigued by your use of the word 'they'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
