ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Is this CM-BrokerDomain-Broker-QM-EG relation correct ?

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Is this CM-BrokerDomain-Broker-QM-EG relation correct ? « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
abhyyy
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:36 pm    Post subject: Is this CM-BrokerDomain-Broker-QM-EG relation correct ? Reply with quote

Voyager

Joined: 29 Sep 2011
Posts: 83

Hi Friends,

Is my below understanding of End-End relation correct, if not, Please advise?

-->1 CM has only 1 Broker Domain.
-->1 Broker Domain can have MULTIPLE Brokers.
-->1 Broker can have MULTIPLE Queue Managers.
-->Each combination of Broker-QM can have MULTIPLE Execution Groups. eg. If Broker1 has 2 QMs (QM1,QM2) then Broker1-QM1 can have multiple Execution Groups (EG1,EG2) and Broker1-QM2 can have multiple Execution Groups (EG3,EG4)
-->And Finally, Each Execution Groups can have multiple Message flows AND multiple instances of same message flows(if configured to support multithreading)

Thanks,
Abhy
_________________
----------------------
NeVeR StOp LeaRnInG.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Esa
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland

First of all, your understanding is a little bit outdated, because from version 7 on there is no CM any more.

Secondly, a broker runs on only one queue manager.


Last edited by Esa on Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
abhyyy
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voyager

Joined: 29 Sep 2011
Posts: 83

So, lets replace CM by Proxy API.

Also Can't we create multiple QMs under a single broker ?
_________________
----------------------
NeVeR StOp LeaRnInG.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Esa
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland

abhyyy wrote:
So, lets replace CM by Proxy API.

Let's not, because Message Broker API is not actually a runtime environment.
abhyyy wrote:

Also Can't we create multiple QMs under a single broker ?

You create Message Broker on top of a queue manager, not the other way around.

Of course a Message Broker can communicate with several queue managers, but the messages are routed by the underlying broker queue manager.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
abhyyy
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voyager

Joined: 29 Sep 2011
Posts: 83

So According to this, Should I consider below as Final Correct relation ?

-->1 Broker Domain can have MULTIPLE Brokers.
-->1 Broker can have Only 1 Queue Manager.
-->Each Broker / QM combination can have MULTIPLE Execution Groups. eg. Broker1-QM1 can have multiple Execution Groups (EG1,EG2) and
Broker2-QM2 can have multiple Execution Groups (EG3,EG4)
-->And Finally, Each Execution Groups can have multiple Message flows AND multiple instances of same message flows(if configured to support multithreading).

Thanks.
_________________
----------------------
NeVeR StOp LeaRnInG.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Esa
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland

That's closer.

Except that the concept of a broker domain does not technically exist any more. But of course you are free to call a group of brokers a domain if you like.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
abhyyy
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 12:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voyager

Joined: 29 Sep 2011
Posts: 83

Thanks a lot for all the clarifications and advice. Have a nice day.
_________________
----------------------
NeVeR StOp LeaRnInG.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Is this CM-BrokerDomain-Broker-QM-EG relation correct ?
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.