Author |
Message
|
Mitra |
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:55 am Post subject: Getting historic record activity for a Queue |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 21 Mar 2011 Posts: 78
|
Hi,
Is there any way to get the historic information about the applications that are connecting to a particular queue to put messages.
I tried searching severals docs like activity record, Queue monitoring but ddin't find any thing for retriving the historic data.
Please help.
Thanks all in Advance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bruce2359 |
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 9469 Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
If you are on WMQ for z/OS, this kind of information is available from SMF records. _________________ I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mitra |
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 21 Mar 2011 Posts: 78
|
We are using AIX and Linux Platforms. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Andyh |
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 29 Jul 2010 Posts: 239
|
MQ queue accounting can be enabled to collect this type of data on the distributed platforms.
You cannot determine this information retrospectively. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zpat |
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001 Posts: 5866 Location: UK
|
What is annoying is that accounting only works (after enablement) when the application reconnects to the QM.
So if you have permanently connected applications, you have to stop them and start them to get accounting event messages and do that again to stop getting accounting event messages.
This is very impractical in production, so I have to say that this much desired feature is actually very hard to make much use of. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rcp_mq |
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Centurion
Joined: 13 Dec 2011 Posts: 133
|
A monitoring tool could help you with that. (Not practical if you want it only for that purpose) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|