Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:29 am Post subject: Similar situation
Apprentice
Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Posts: 35 Location: US
hi,
I am facing a similar problem. Developer is using groupId and also setting Last Message Flag. Can you use rfh2 header instead? will MQ/Broker still look for last message flag?
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:40 am Post subject: Re: Similar situation
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
irony wrote:
I am facing a similar problem.
Similar how? In the original 2 year old thread, the OP's problem was that the messages were grouped but not tagged with a last message flag. Here:
irony wrote:
Developer is using groupId and also setting Last Message Flag.
So in what way is this similar?
irony wrote:
Can you use rfh2 header instead?
For what? Grouping messages? No. Unless you remove all WMQ flags, read all the messages, store them someplace keyed by an RFH2 usr property and write code to group them. Which seems like a faff.
Of course the OP was using WMB so if your problem is similar you shouldn't have a RFH2 because you're on v7.
irony wrote:
will MQ/Broker still look for last message flag?
Apparently. If your messages are grouped it should do.
Why not start a new thread describing your problem rather than making us guess what's wrong using a 2 year old thread as a baseline? _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum