| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| MQ V7 multi-instance queue manager HA vs Load balancing |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| mqjeff |
 Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:07 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| mvic wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| So when we do talk about an active-active MI configuration, we are discussing two separate active-passive queue managers. |
Just as with HACMP et al? |
yes, exactly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| ayeh |
| Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 21 Oct 2001
Posts: 18
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
don't misunderstand what MI provides.
MI is still an active-passive setup, not an active-active setup.
So when we do talk about an active-active MI configuration, we are discussing two separate active-passive queue managers. |
Thanks for clearing that up because I didn't see any other evidence of active/active except in these forums, which confused the heck out of me.
Arthur |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| ayeh wrote: |
Thanks for clearing that up because I didn't see any other evidence of active/active except in these forums, which confused the heck out of me.
Arthur |
One of those classics of different interpretations, e.g. clustering WMQ-wise and clustering hardware-wise. Active-Active can be interpreted as a server running ready to take over, which from a hardware perspective is accurate, but from a WMQ perspective is not.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
