| Author |
Message
|
| sap3 |
 Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:05 pm Post subject: web services from v1.0 to v1.1 |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 9
|
What I'm simulating is an evolutions of web services from v1.0 to v1.1 with v1.1 being backward compatible.
First WSDL simulates version v1.0 of the service consumed by say Client1
Second WSDL simulates version v1.1 of the service by adding another operation to v1.0 but still backward compatible.
This service would be consumed by Client2.
However, when we run Second WSDL service (simulating Client2 consuming it), we also need to make sure Client1 is still able to consume its v1.0 service.
Can anyone let me know how i can proceed with the message flow...any sample message flow would be greatly appreciated...
Thanks, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
Put the service version in the Endpoint URL?
| Code: |
http://myserver:myport/My_WebService_Endpoint_V01_00
and
http://myserver:myport/My_WebService_Endpoint_V02_00
|
Or if you are willing to spend some money, buy WSRR and integrate that into your ESB.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 6:21 am Post subject: Re: web services from v1.0 to v1.1 |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| sap3 wrote: |
| Can anyone let me know how i can proceed with the message flow...any sample message flow would be greatly appreciated... |
I'm not entirely sure I understand the question. All you claim to be doing is adding a new operation to the existing service. Why wouldn't the existing operation continue to function?
As to testing if the "new" service works with the existing WSDL, SoapUI is a great tool for this.
This is all self evident so I'm certain I must have missed your point.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sap3 |
| Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 9
|
Continution to my question which i posted earlier...
After i get the First/v1.0 WSDL (which simulates version v1.0 of the service) loaded and working on WMB toolkit, I'd assume then i would load Second/v1.1 WSDL. Now the toolkit would be running both v1.0 and v1.1 thus supporting Client and Client2.
I want to know is something possible like this message broker? If so please let me know...
Thank you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| sap3 wrote: |
Continution to my question which i posted earlier...
After i get the First/v1.0 WSDL (which simulates version v1.0 of the service) loaded and working on WMB toolkit, I'd assume then i would load Second/v1.1 WSDL. Now the toolkit would be running both v1.0 and v1.1 thus supporting Client and Client2.
I want to know is something possible like this message broker? If so please let me know...
Thank you! |
If version 1.1 supports version 1.0 have you tried to just send a Version 1.0 message to the 1.1 flow? 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
| sap3 wrote: |
Continution to my question which i posted earlier...
After i get the First/v1.0 WSDL (which simulates version v1.0 of the service) loaded and working on WMB toolkit, I'd assume then i would load Second/v1.1 WSDL. Now the toolkit would be running both v1.0 and v1.1 thus supporting Client and Client2.
I want to know is something possible like this message broker? If so please let me know...
Thank you! |
The toolkit does not run the flows. The runtime does that. Perhaps you should give yourself a new years resolution to get some training.
If the two WSDL's and the flows that use them have the same endpoint name then they can't run in the same Execution Group. My previous reply shows two services in the same EG.
This
| Code: |
http://myserver:myport_0/My_WebService_Endpoint
and
http://myserver:myport_1/My_WebService_Endpoint
|
shows two services with the same name running in different EG's.
You are obviously confused by this whole WebService thing. Please take some time to understand that then your problem will solve itself.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| sap3 wrote: |
| After i get the First/v1.0 WSDL (which simulates version v1.0 of the service) loaded and working on WMB toolkit, I'd assume then i would load Second/v1.1 WSDL. Now the toolkit would be running both v1.0 and v1.1 thus supporting Client and Client2. |
The toolkit doesn't run anything.
Also if you have 2 WSDLs with 2 different operations then you have 2 different web services not 2 different levels.
| sap3 wrote: |
| I want to know is something possible like this message broker? |
It's not possible with web services so no, it's not possible with WMB. I stand by my original response; if you're adding a new operation to an existing web service or enhancing the existing web service, that's entirely different to adding a new service with it's own WSDL.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sap3 |
| Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 9
|
Thank you everyone for all your support and answers...
Thanks, |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
