| Author |
Message
|
| mqjeff |
 Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:00 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
I'm sure he's hoping to find out if an MQRFH2 is compressed or not.
I think you really need a PMR to find out for sure.
or, you know, some wireshark tracing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| I'm sure he's hoping to find out if an MQRFH2 is compressed or not. |
MQRFH2? In WMQv7? 
I cover my ears that I do not hear such things!
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| I'm sure he's hoping to find out if an MQRFH2 is compressed or not. |
MQRFH2? In WMQv7?
I cover my ears that I do not hear such things! |
Where did he indicate we were no longer still talking about v6, as this thread is titled? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Where did he indicate we were no longer still talking about v6, as this thread is titled? |
The thread was titled that 5 years ago by someone else.
Any discussion on v6 is irrelevant as the movement to v7 should already be underway.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Where did he indicate we were no longer still talking about v6, as this thread is titled? |
The thread was titled that 5 years ago by someone else.
Any discussion on v6 is irrelevant as the movement to v7 should already be underway. |
but clearly crossland had a reason for resurrecting this thread intact, rather than starting a new one.
For example that he is specifically still addressing v6. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20763
Location: LI,NY
|
Well I certainly hope that he is not at V 6.0.2.6 or V 6.0.2.7 as those were known to need an APAR where (message) compression is concerned. 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9475
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
crossman's question seems to be 'what headers will be compressed by the sending channel end?' Since the receiving end will decompress what was compressed at the sending end, I'm pondering if crossman is merely curious, or if there is an actual issue.
Most WMQ structures (MQMD, XQH) are relatively small. Generally, large application message data is/are more likely to benefit from compression, as compared with WMQ structures.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
