| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| AMQ9915 from .NET |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| mqjeff |
 Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 9:34 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| And the client is installed properly, it's not a .NET managed client installation? |
It's a full client install that amqsgetc seems to believe in, and I'm given to understand that to make a managed connection we'd need a different transport property. Or do we? Note to self: check setting of NM_LIB_whatever.....
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| Is the output from dspmqver correct on the box? |
Yes - 7.0.1.5 |
Try the .NET sample app that mvic mentioned.
And, again, confirm that you are using an address that actually reaches the TCP/IP stack, which it is entirely possible that neither localhost nor 127.0.0.1 do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mvic |
| Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| Vitor, did you get past this problem? What was the cause? Just interested... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mvic wrote: |
| Vitor, did you get past this problem? What was the cause? Just interested... |
No we didn't. Other imperatives caused us to sidestep the problem by passing the details in the MQQueueManager constructor rather than setting them in the MQEnvironment.
It's on my list of things to look into when I have time. Unlike posting the results on this thread, which slipped my mind completely. 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
