ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Clustering » Clusters by applications, or clusters by qmanagers?

Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2
 Clusters by applications, or clusters by qmanagers? « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Vitor
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

fjb_saper wrote:
And you forgot to mention Attack of the Qmgr Clone, which can wreak havoc either in a single cluster or in multiple clusters....




I'd forgotten that particular b-movie horror sci-fi classic.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gerimqseries
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 30

for everbody:
*************
thanks for the quick replies, so I think we will not make clusters by applications (because I want to get an Xmas card from the admins ), we do not benefit anything on it.


for bruce2359:
*************
That was the "storage allocation error"
03/30/11 17:12:04 - Process(5877898.1) User(mqm) Program(amqrrmfa)
Host(geri3)
AMQ9442: Refresh Cluster command processed.

EXPLANATION:
The Refresh Cluster(WMB6) command caused 98 objects to be refreshed and 20
objects to be republished.
ACTION:
None.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/30/11 17:12:05 - Process(5877898.1) User(mqm) Program(amqrrmfa)
Host(geri3)
AMQ9500: No Repository storage

EXPLANATION:
An operation failed because there was no storage available in the repository.
An attempt was made to allocate 4 bytes from Pid(5877898) RepositoryType(1),
UsedBlocks(2).
ACTION:
Reconfigure the Queue Manager to allocate a larger repository.
----- amqrfica.c : 3120 -------------------------------------------------------
03/30/11 17:12:05 - Process(5877898.1) User(mqm) Program(amqrrmfa)
Host(geri3)
AMQ9422: Repository manager error, RC=0

EXPLANATION:
An internal error has occurred.
ACTION:
Collect the items listed in the 'Problem determination' section of the System
Administration manual and use either the WMQ Support site:
http://www.ibm.com/software/integration/wmq/support/, or IBM Support Assistant
(ISA): http://www.ibm.com/software/support/isa/, to see whether a solution is
already available. If you are unable to find a match, contact your IBM support
center.
----- amqrfica.c : 3304 -------------------------------------------------------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

If this is on the MF check the storage class and max depth of your SYSTEM.CLUSTER.* queues.

If on distributed check the diskspace on var/mqm/qmgrs/<yourqmgrname>
and the diskspace for the logs... and verify max qdepth as well...

Have fun
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2 Page 2 of 2

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Clustering » Clusters by applications, or clusters by qmanagers?
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.