| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| QM1-QM2 to QM1-QM3-QM2 while preserving QM1/2 channel names? |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| mavey |
 Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:20 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 4
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| exerk wrote: |
| IPT is a 'pure' WMQ solution! |
We use it, and it requires very little support.
From time to time (once in a quarter?) we bounce the MQIPT server, mainly to clear connections in close_wait state...(netstat -an). |
That shouldn't be necessary, that is unless it's running on Solaris, which is crap in more ways than one, or the IPT is badly written... We can't afford to restart it more than once, twice a year. I'll check it out a test it, thank you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
I don't believe it has anything to do with MQIPT. I believe it has more to do with the network and communications. Remember that you are dependent on outside communications and the quality of such is not under your control.
Have fun 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
One of the benefits of using MQIPT in the DMZ, versus a Queue Manager, is that it eliminates the possibility of a message sitting on a queue, and thus possibly on local disk, in the DMZ. Not having data sit in the DMZ is not an uncommon requirement.
We use MQIPT in the DMZ as well.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
