Author |
Message
|
john01 |
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 16 Jun 2010 Posts: 21 Location: PT
|
Hi,
It's not ease to be more interactive because I'm in a diferrent time zone.
First I understand the advises about bottlenecks. At the end I'd like to do whatever I want inside this kind of input gateway, including initialize my environment depending of input node.
I will have an UDN with a Mq gateway and other with a Soap Gateway and so on. All have differents inputs nodes. I'd like to abstract the other team from all the configurations related to differents gateways, besides the integrity!
Please, I'd like to redirect the focus of this topic to my problem related to "UDN from a subflow":
For now I have this simple UDN gateway from a subflow:
[MQ input] > [trace] > [output]
Could be a toolkit bug? Or a problem between the chair and the keyboard ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
There are some APARS in this area at the 7.0.0.0 and 7.0.0.1 level... you might try updating a single copy of the Toolkit to 7.0.0.2 and use that to package your subflow as a UDN and see if it helps. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
john01 wrote: |
Please, I'd like to redirect the focus of this topic to my problem related to "UDN from a subflow":
For now I have this simple UDN gateway from a subflow:
[MQ input] > [trace] > [output] |
Successfully achieved...
john01 wrote: |
Could be a toolkit bug? Or a problem between the chair and the keyboard ? |
As I said a few posts back, this sounds like tooling to me. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john01 |
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 16 Jun 2010 Posts: 21 Location: PT
|
mqjeff wrote: |
There are some APARS in this area at the 7.0.0.0 and 7.0.0.1 level... you might try updating a single copy of the Toolkit to 7.0.0.2 and use that to package your subflow as a UDN and see if it helps. |
Thanks for reply, but I'm already using the 7.0.0.2 toolkit version.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
john01 wrote: |
mqjeff wrote: |
There are some APARS in this area at the 7.0.0.0 and 7.0.0.1 level... you might try updating a single copy of the Toolkit to 7.0.0.2 and use that to package your subflow as a UDN and see if it helps. |
Thanks for reply, but I'm already using the 7.0.0.2 toolkit version.  |
Nobody said you weren't!
I'd enquire with the vendors via a PMR. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john01 |
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 16 Jun 2010 Posts: 21 Location: PT
|
Vitor wrote: |
I'd enquire with the vendors via a PMR. |
I'll do it.
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|