| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| Alter access to allow only one user to put clustered queue |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| exerk |
 Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:34 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| ...Maybe an ALMOST-PROD is necessary to do any last minute testing. |
Surely that's what REAL-PROD is for? 
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9471
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
I'm of the opinion that there should be no testing or development whatsoever in PROD. I believe that application testing and development should take place in TEST only.
If end-user testing (validation, really) in QA fails, then the app and security issues should resolved in TEST; then percolated to QA again; then to PROD.
Yes, I recognize that in rare instances an emergency fix might be allowable in PROD; but this should be the rare exception. The emergency fix should be re-certified in TEST, QA, and then be percolated to PROD.
Saying that things are (or need to be) different from QA to PROD doesn't explain why this is necessary or even a good thing.
Perhaps I'm expecting utopia. But I just can't bring myself to tell the boss or auditors that we routinely test in production. Perhaps this is my mainframe upbringing...
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
