| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| Is there anyway to convert between ASCII & EBCDIC? |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| vandemon |
 Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:13 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 32
|
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| vandemon wrote: |
| Which 1 is better??? |
What do you mean by 'better'? |
In terms of reliability... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| vandemon wrote: |
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| vandemon wrote: |
| Which 1 is better??? |
What do you mean by 'better'? |
In terms of reliability... |
The one that's got the whole of IBM's resources behind it to test it with every new OS patch, code page change and other variation. The one that's got the whole of IBM's resources behind it to tune it, increase it's speed & efficientcy and reduce resource usage. The one that IBM will devote their entire resources to fixing if you contact them with a problem.
I'm assuming here your software development resources are slightly less impressive than IBM's of course.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| vandemon wrote: |
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| vandemon wrote: |
| Which 1 is better??? |
What do you mean by 'better'? |
In terms of reliability... |
Take your pick...a home-grown solution with limited testing exposure, or one that has had a large commercial corporation behind it, which has had hundreds (if not thousands) of 'beta' testers?
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vandemon |
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 32
|
| vitas wrote: |
| vandemon wrote: |
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| vandemon wrote: |
| Which 1 is better??? |
What do you mean by 'better'? |
In terms of reliability... |
The one that's got the whole of IBM's resources behind it to test it with every new OS patch, code page change and other variation. The one that's got the whole of IBM's resources behind it to tune it, increase it's speed & efficientcy and reduce resource usage. The one that IBM will devote their entire resources to fixing if you contact them with a problem.
I'm assuming here your software development resources are slightly less impressive than IBM's of course. |
Ok... Thx a lot... Just to confirm... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vandemon |
| Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 32
|
| exerk wrote: |
| vandemon wrote: |
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| vandemon wrote: |
| Which 1 is better??? |
What do you mean by 'better'? |
In terms of reliability... |
Take your pick...a home-grown solution with limited testing exposure, or one that has had a large commercial corporation behind it, which has had hundreds (if not thousands) of 'beta' testers? |
Ok thx... Appreaciate your help...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
