Author |
Message
|
angka |
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:10 am Post subject: Mapping Node catches throw statement |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Posts: 406
|
Hi,
Below are my flow (simplified version):
MQInputNode-out->mappingNode-out->ComputeNode-out->RouteToLabel
Label-out->DataInsert-out->ComputeNode1-out->MQOutputNode
the "mappingNode" and the "DataInsert" are connected to a failure path. "MQInputNode" is connect to catch path.
Why did the failure path in "mappingNode" catch the throw statement in "ComputeNode1"? Shouldn't the "MQInputNode" catch path catch the throw statement instead?
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gaya3 |
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 2493 Location: Boston, US
|
you are asking why Message broker is misbehaving like this isnt it
I suggest you should go through the Error Handling Part in message broker.
AFIK it will go to the previous nodes catch / Failure node. as this is a roll back scenario _________________ Regards
Gayathri
-----------------------------------------------
Do Something Before you Die |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
angka |
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Posts: 406
|
Hi,
But I thought failure node is for error tt is generated within the node while catch node is for error tt is generated after it leaves the node. in the e.g. provided above, the only catch path connected is the MQInputNode. Shouldn't the failure node in "mappingNode" only catch error tt is generated within the node itself?? thanks. correct me if i got it all wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mgk |
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 31 Jul 2003 Posts: 1642
|
Quote: |
I thought failure node is for error tt is generated within the node while catch node is for error tt is generated after it leaves the node |
This is correct. If the Mapping node really is sending downstream exceptions to its failure terminal, then please raise a PMR.
Kind Regards, _________________ MGK
The postings I make on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
angka |
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Posts: 406
|
Hi,
Thanks. I had raised a PMR |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
prasad.edlabadkar |
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 21 Location: Pune, India
|
Can you please let me know the PMR #?
angka wrote: |
Hi,
Thanks. I had raised a PMR |
_________________ Thanks and Regards
Prasad Edlabadkar
Tech Lead - Websphere Business Integration |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|